What is the major similarity between traditional theories and conceptual models?

1. Eccles M, Grimshaw J, Walker A, Johnston M, Pitts N. Changing the behavior of healthcare professionals: the use of theory in promoting the uptake of research findings. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:107–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

2. Davies P, Walker A, Grimshaw J. Theories of behavior change in studies of guideline implementation. Proc Br Psychol Soc. 2003;11:120. [Google Scholar]

3. Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, Lawton R, Parker D, Walker A. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:26–33. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

4. Sales A, Smith J, Curran G, Kochevar L. Models, strategies, and tools: theory in implementing evidence-based findings into health care practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:S43–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

5. Kitson AL, Harvey G, McCormack B. Enabling the implementation of evidence-based practice: a conceptual framework. Qual Health Care. 1998;7:149–58. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

7. Godin G, Bélanger-Gravel A, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Healthcare professionals’ intentions and behaviours: a systematic review of studies based on social cognitive theories. Implement Sci. 2008;3:36. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. Mitchell SA, Fisher CA, Hastings CE, Silverman LB, Wallen GR. A thematic analysis of theoretical models for translating science in nursing: mapping the field. Nurs Outlook. 2010;58:287–300. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

9. Rycroft-Malone J, Bucknall T. Theory, Frameworks, and Models: Laying Down the Groundwork. In: Rycroft-Malone J, Bucknall T, editors. Models and Frameworks for Implementing Evidence-Based Practice: Linking Evidence to Action. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. pp. 23–50. [Google Scholar]

10. Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012;7:37. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

11. Martinez RG, Lewis CC, Weiner BJ. Instrumentation issues in implementation science. Implement Sci. 2014;9:118. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

12. Eccles MP, Mittman BS. Welcome to implementation science. Implement Sci. 2006;1:1. [Google Scholar]

13. Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, Straus SE, Tetroe J, Caswell W, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006;26:13–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

14. Estabrooks CA, Thompson DS, Lovely JE, Hofmeyer A. A guide to knowledge translation theory. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006;26:25–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

15. Wilson KM, Brady TJ, Lesesne C, on behalf of the NCCDPHP Work Group on Translation An organizing framework for translation in public health: the knowledge to action framework. Prev Chronic Dis. 2011;8:A46. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

16. Rabin BA, Brownson RC. Developing the Terminology for Dissemination and Implementation Research. In: Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK, editors. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. pp. 23–51. [Google Scholar]

17. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Bate P, Macfarlane F, Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organisations: A Systematic Literature Review. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing; 2005. [Google Scholar]

18. Jones K. Mission drift in qualitative research, or moving toward a systematic review of qualitative studies, moving back to a more systematic narrative review. Qual Rep. 2004;9:95–112. [Google Scholar]

19. Cronin P, Ryan F, Coughlan M. Undertaking a literature review: a step-by-step approach. Br J Nurs. 2008;17:38–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

20. Rycroft-Malone J, Bucknall T. Models and Frameworks for Implementing Evidence-Based Practice: Linking Evidence to Action. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. [Google Scholar]

21. Nutley SM, Walter I, Davies HTO. Using evidence: how research can inform public services. Bristol: The Policy Press; 2007. [Google Scholar]

22. Grol R, Wensing M, Eccles M. Improving Patient Care: The Implementation of Change in Clinical Practice. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2005. [Google Scholar]

23. Straus S, Tetroe J, Graham ID. Knowledge Translation in Health Care. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2009. [Google Scholar]

24. Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. [Google Scholar]

25. Graham ID, Tetroe J. Some theoretical underpinnings of knowledge translation. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14:936–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

26. Flottorp SA, Oxman AD, Krause J, Musila NR, Wensing M, Godycki-Cwirko M, et al. A checklist for identifying determinants of practice: a systematic review and synthesis of frameworks and taxonomies of factors that prevent or enable improvements in healthcare professional practice. Implement Sci. 2013;8:35. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

27. Meyers DC, Durlak JA, Wandersman A. The Quality Implementation Framework: a synthesis of critical steps in the implementation process. Am J Community Psychol. 2012;50:462–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

28. Tabak RG, Khoong EC, Chambers DA, Brownson RC. Bridging research and practice: models for dissemination and implementation research. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43:337–50. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

29. Frankfort-Nachmias C, Nachmias D. Research Methods in the Social Sciences. London: Arnold; 1996. [Google Scholar]

30. Wacker JG. A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. J Oper Manag. 1998;16:361–85. [Google Scholar]

31. Carpiano RM, Daley DM. A guide and glossary on postpositivist theory building for population health. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60:564–70. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

32. Bunge M. Scientific Research 1: The Search for System. New York: Springer; 1967. [Google Scholar]

33. Reynolds PD. A Primer in Theory Construction. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill Educational Publishing; 1971. [Google Scholar]

34. Dubin R. Theory Building. New York: Free Press; 1978. [Google Scholar]

35. Hunt SD. Modern Marketing Theory: Critical Issues in the Philosophy of Marketing Science. Cincinnati, OH: Southwestern Publishing; 1991. [Google Scholar]

36. Bluedorn AC, Evered RD. Middle Range Theory and the Strategies of Theory Construction. In: Pinder CC, Moore LF, editors. Middle Range Theory and The Study of Organizations. Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff; 1980. pp. 19–32. [Google Scholar]

37. Cairney P. Understanding Public Policy—Theories and Issues. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012. [Google Scholar]

38. Sabatier PA. Theories of the Policy Process. 2. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 2007. [Google Scholar]

39. Kitson AL, Rycroft-Malone J, Harvey G, McCormack B, Seers K, Titchen A. Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: theoretical and practical challenges. Implement Sci. 2008;3:1. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

40. Huberman M. Research utilization: the state of the art. Knowl Policy. 1994;7:13–33. [Google Scholar]

41. Landry R, Amara N, Lamari M. Climbing the ladder of research utilization: evidence from social science. Sci Commun. 2001;22:396–422. [Google Scholar]

43. Davis SM, Peterson JC, Helfrich CD, Cunningham-Sabo L. Introduction and conceptual model for utilization of prevention research. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33:1S. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

44. Majdzadeh R, Sadighi J, Nejat S, Mahani AS, Ghdlami J. Knowledge translation for research utilization: design of a knowledge translation model at Teheran University of Medical Science. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2008;28:270–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

45. Graham ID, Tetroe J, KT Theories Group . Planned Action Theories. In: Straus S, Tetroe J, Graham ID, editors. Knowledge Translation in Health Care. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2009. pp. 185–95. [Google Scholar]

46. Rycroft-Malone J, Bucknall T. Analysis and Synthesis of Models and Frameworks. In: Rycroft-Malone J, Bucknall T, editors. Models and Frameworks for Implementing Evidence-Based Practice: Linking Evidence to Action. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. pp. 223–45. [Google Scholar]

47. Stetler CB. Stetler model. In: Rycroft-Malone J, Bucknall T, editors. Models and Frameworks for Implementing Evidence-Based Practice: Linking Evidence to Action. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. pp. 51–82. [Google Scholar]

48. Stevens KR. The impact of evidence-based practice in nursing and the next big ideas. Online J Issues Nurs. 2013;18(2):4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

49. Titler MG, Kleiber C, Steelman V, Goode C, Rakel B, Barry-Walker J, et al. Infusing research into practice to promote quality care. Nurs Res. 1995;43:307–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

50. Titler MG, Kleiber C, Steelman VJ, Rakel BA, Budreau G, Everett LQ, et al. The Iowa Model of evidence-based practice to promote quality care. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2001;13:497–509. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

51. Logan J, Graham I. Toward a comprehensive interdisciplinary model of health care research use. Sci Commun. 1998;20:227–46. [Google Scholar]

52. Logan J, Graham I. The Ottawa Model of Research Use. In: Rycroft-Malone J, Bucknall T, editors. Models and Frameworks for Implementing Evidence-Based Practice: Linking Evidence to Action. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. pp. 83–108. [Google Scholar]

53. Grol R, Wensing M. What drives change? Barriers to and incentives for achieving evidence-based practice. Med J Aust. 2004;180:S57–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

54. Pronovost PJ, Berenholtz SM, Needham DM. Translating evidence into practice: a model for large scale knowledge translation. BMJ. 2008;337:a1714. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

55. Field B, Booth A, Ilott I, Gerrish K. Using the Knowledge to Action Framework in practice: a citation analysis and systematic review. Implement Sci. 2014;9:172. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

56. Stetler C. Refinement of the Stetler/Marram Model for application of research findings to practice. Nurs Outlook. 1994;42:15–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

57. Durlak JA, DuPre EP. Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. Am J Community Psychol. 2008;41:327–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

58. Gurses AP, Marsteller JA, Ozok AA, Xiao Y, Owens S, Pronovost PJ. Using an interdisciplinary approach to identify factors that affect clinicians’ compliance with evidence-based guidelines. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(8 Suppl):S282–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

59. Cochrane LJ, Olson CA, Murray S, Dupuis M, Tooman T, Hayes S. Gaps between knowing and doing: understanding and assessing the barriers to optimal health care. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2007;27:94–102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

60. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

61. Ferlie E, Shortell SM. Improving the quality of health care in the United Kingdom and the United States: a framework for change. Milbank Q. 2001;79:281–315. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

62. Jacobson N, Butterill D, Goering P. Development of a framework for knowledge translation: understanding user context. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003;8:94–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

63. Blase KA, Van Dyke M, Fixsen DL, Bailey FW. Implementation Science: Key Concepts, Themes and Evidence for Practitioners in Educational Psychology. In: Kelly B, Perkins DF, editors. Handbook of Implementation Science for Psychology in Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012. pp. 13–34. [Google Scholar]

64. Rycroft-Malone J. Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) In: Rycroft-Malone J, Bucknall T, editors. Models and Frameworks for Implementing Evidence-Based Practice: Linking Evidence to Action. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. pp. 109–36. [Google Scholar]

65. Helfrich CD, Damschroder LJ, Hagedorn HJ, Daggett GS, Sahay A, Ritchie M, et al. A critical synthesis of literature on the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) framework. Implement Sci. 2010;5:82. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

66. Michie S, Atkins L, West R. A guide to using the Behaviour Change Wheel. London: Silverback Publishing; 2014. [Google Scholar]

67. Fixsen DL, Naoom SF, Blase KA, Friedman RM, Wallace F. Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the Literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute; 2005. [Google Scholar]

68. Holmes BJ, Finegood DT, Riley BL, Best A. Systems Thinking in Dissemination and Implementation Research. In: Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK, editors. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. pp. 192–212. [Google Scholar]

69. Légaré F, Ratté S, Gravel K, Graham ID. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice. Update of a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73:526–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

70. Johnson M, Jackson R, Guillaume L, Meier P, Goyder E. Barriers and facilitators to implementing screening and brief intervention for alcohol misuse: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. J Public Health. 2011;33:412–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

71. Verweij LM, Proper KI, Leffelaar ER, Weel ANH, Nauta AP, Hulshof CTJ, et al. Barriers and facilitators to implementation of an occupational health guideline aimed at preventing weight gain among employees in the Netherlands. J Occup Environ Med. 2012;54:954–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

72. Broyles LM, Rodriguez KL, Kraemer KL, Sevick MA, Price PA, Gordon AJ. A qualitative study of anticipated barriers and facilitators to the implementation of nurse-delivered alcohol screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment for hospitalized patients in a Veterans Affairs medical centre. Addiction Sci Clin Pract. 2012;7:7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

73. Dopson S, Fitzgerald L. The Active Role of Context. In: Dopson S, Fitzgerald L, editors. Knowledge to Action? Evidence-Based Health Care in Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005. pp. 79–103. [Google Scholar]

74. Ashton CM, Khan MM, Johnson ML, Walder A, Stanberry E, Beyth RJ, et al. A quasi-experimental test of an intervention to increase the use of thiazide-based treatment regimens for people with hypertension. Implement Sci. 2007;2:5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

75. Mohr DC, VanDeusen LC, Meterko M. Predicting healthcare employees’ participation in an office redesign program: attitudes, norms and behavioral control. Implement Sci. 2008;3:47. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

76. Scott SD, Plotnikoff RC, Karunamuni N, Bize R, Rodgers W. Factors influencing the adoption of an innovation: an examination of the uptake of the Canadian Heart Health Kit (HHK) Implement Sci. 2008;3:41. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

77. Zardo P, Collie A. Predicting research use in a public health policy environment: results of a logistic regression analysis. Implement Sci. 2014;9:142. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

78. Gabbay J, Le May A. Evidence based guidelines or collectively constructed “mindlines”? Ethnographic study of knowledge management in primary care. Br Med J. 2011;329:1–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

79. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behaviour. New York: John Wiley; 1975. [Google Scholar]

80. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: towards a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84:191–215. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

81. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Cognitive Social Theory. Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1986. [Google Scholar]

82. Triandis HC. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation; Beliefs, Attitude, and values: 1979. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press; 1979. Values, Attitudes, and Interpersonal Behaviour; pp. 195–259. [Google Scholar]

83. Ajzen I. Attitudes, Personality and Behavior. Milton Keynes: Open University Press; 1988. [Google Scholar]

84. Nilsen P, Roback K, Broström A, Ellström PE. Creatures of habit: accounting for the role of habit in implementation research on clinical behaviour change. Implement Sci. 2012;7:53. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

85. Hammond KR. Principles of Organization in Intuitive and Analytical Cognition. Boulder, CO: Center for Research on Judgment and Policy, University of Colorado; 1981. [Google Scholar]

86. Benner P. From Novice to Expert, Excellence and Power in Clinical Nursing Practice. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley Publishing; 1984. [Google Scholar]

87. Epstein S. Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. Am Psychol. 1994;49:709–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

88. Ouelette JA, Wood W. Habit and intention in everyday life: the multiple processes by which past behaviour predicts future behaviour. Psychol Bull. 1998;124:54–74. [Google Scholar]

89. Verplanken B, Aarts H. Habit, attitude, and planned behaviour: is habit an empty construct or an interesting case of goal-directed automaticity? Eur Rev Soc Psychol. 1999;10:101–34. [Google Scholar]

90. Eccles MP, Hrisos S, Francis JJ, Steen N, Bosch M, Johnston M. Can the collective intentions of individual professionals within healthcare teams predict the team’s performance: developing methods and theory. Implement Sci. 2009;4:24. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

91. Parchman ML, Scoglio CM, Schumm P. Understanding the implementation of evidence-based care: a structural network approach. Implement Sci. 2011;6:14. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

92. Cunningham FC, Ranmuthugala G, Plumb J, Georgiou A, Westbrook JI, Braithwaite J. Health professional networks as a vector for improving healthcare quality and safety: a systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000187. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

93. Mascia D, Cicchetti A. Physician social capital and the reported adoption of evidence-based medicine: exploring the role of structural holes. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72:798–805. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

94. Wallin L, Ewald U, Wikblad K, Scott-Findlay S, Arnetz BB. Understanding work contextual factors: a short-cut to evidence-based practice? Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2006;3:153–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

95. Meijers JMM, Janssen MAP, Cummings GG, Wallin L, Estabrooks CA, Halfens RYG. Assessing the relationship between contextual factors and research utilization in nursing: systematic literature review. J Adv Nurs. 2006;55:622–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

96. Wensing M, Wollersheim H, Grol R. Organizational interventions to implement improvements in patient care: a structured review of reviews. Implement Sci. 2006;1:2. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

97. Gifford W, Davies B, Edwards N, Griffin P, Lybanon V. Managerial leadership for nurses’ use of research evidence: an integrative review of the literature. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2007;4:126–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

98. Yano EM. The role of organizational research in implementing evidence-based practice: QUERI series. Implement Sci. 2008;3:29. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

99. French B, Thomas LH, Baker P, Burton CR, Pennington L, Roddam H. What can management theories offer evidence-based practice? A comparative analysis of measurement tools for organizational context. Implement Sci. 2009;4:28. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

100. Parmelli E, Flodgren G, Beyer F, Baillie N, Schaafsma ME, Eccles MP. The effectiveness of strategies to change organisational culture to improve healthcare performance: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2011;6:33. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

101. Chaudoir SR, Dugan AG, Barr CHI. Measuring factors affecting implementation of health innovations: a systematic review of structural, organizational, provider, patient, and innovation level measures. Implement Sci. 2013;8:22. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

102. Orlikowski W. Improvising organizational transformation over time: a situated change perspective. Inform Syst Res. 1994;7:63–92. [Google Scholar]

103. DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW. The New Institutionalism and Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1991. [Google Scholar]

104. Scott WR. Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1995. [Google Scholar]

106. Waldrop MM. Complexity: The Emerging Science at The Edge of Order and Chaos. London: Viking; 1992. [Google Scholar]

107. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. 5. New York: Free Press; 2003. [Google Scholar]

108. Aubert BA, Hamel G. Adoption of smart cards in the medical sector: the Canadian experience. Soc Sci Med. 2001;53:879–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

109. Vollink T, Meertens R, Midden CJH. Innovating ‘diffusion of innovation’ theory: innovation characteristics and the intention of utility companies to adopt energy conservation interventions. J Environ Psychol. 2002;22:333–44. [Google Scholar]

110. Foy R, MacLennan G, Grimshaw J, Penney G, Campbell M, Grol R. Attributes of clinical recommendations that influence change in practice following audit and feedback. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55:717–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

111. Oxman AD, Thomson MA, Davis DA, Haynes RB. No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. CMAJ. 1995;153:1423–31. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

112. Grimshaw J, McAuley LM, Bero LA, Grilli R, Oxman AD, Ramsay C, et al. Systematic reviews of effectiveness of quality improvement strategies and programmes. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12:298–303. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

113. Walter I, Nutley SM, Davies HTO. Developing a taxonomy of interventions used to increase the impact of research. St. Andrews: University of St Andrews; 2003. Discussion Paper 3, Research Unit for Research Utilisation, University of St. Andrews.

114. Leeman J, Baernholdt M, Sandelowski M. Developing a theory-based taxonomy of methods for implementing change in practice. J Adv Nurs. 2007;58:191–200. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

115. Estabrooks CA, Derksen L, Winther C, Lavis JN, Scott SD, Wallin L, et al. The intellectual structure and substance of the knowledge utilization field: a longitudinal author co-citation analysis, 1945 to 2004. Implement Sci. 2008;3:49. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

116. Klein KJ, Sorra JS. The challenge of innovation implementation. Acad Manage Rev. 1996;21:1055–80. [Google Scholar]

117. Zahra AS, George G. Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization and extension. Acad Manage Rev. 2002;27:185–203. [Google Scholar]

119. Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6:42. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

120. May C, Finch T. Implementing, embedding and integrating practices: an outline of Normalization Process Theory. Sociology. 2009;43:535. [Google Scholar]

121. May C, Finch T, Mair F, Ballini L, Dowrick C, Eccles M, et al. Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the normalization process model. Implement Sci. 2007;7:148. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

122. Finch TL, Rapley T, Girling M, Mair FS, Murray E, Treweek S, et al. Improving the normalization of complex interventions: measure development based on normalization process theory (NoMAD): study protocol. Implement Sci. 2013;8:43. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

123. Murray E, Treweek S, Pope C, MacFarlane A, Ballini L, Dowrick C, et al. Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions. BMC Med. 2010;8:63. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

124. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:1322–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

125. Green LW, Kreuter MW. Health Program Planning: An Educational and Ecological Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2005. [Google Scholar]

126. Proctor E, Silmere H, RaghaVan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Admin Policy Mental Health. 2011;38:65–76. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

127. Phillips CJ, Marshall AP, Chaves NJ, Lin IB, Loy CT, Rees G, et al. Experiences of using Theoretical Domains Framework across diverse clinical environments: a qualitative study. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2015;8:139–46. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

128. Fleming A, Bradley C, Cullinan S, Byrne S. Antibiotic prescribing in long-term care facilities: a qualitative, multidisciplinary investigation. BMJ Open. 2014;4(11) [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

129. McEvoy R, Ballini L, Maltoni S, O’Donnell CA, Mair FS, MacFarlane A. A qualitative systematic review of studies using the normalization process theory to research implementation processes. Implement Sci. 2014;9:2. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

130. Connell LA, McMahon NE, Redfern J, Watkins CL, Eng JJ. Development of a behaviour change intervention to increase upper limb exercise in stroke rehabilitation. Implement Sci. 2015;10:34. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

131. Praveen D, Patel A, Raghu A, Clifford GD, Maulik PK, Abdul AM, et al. Development and field evaluation of a mobile clinical decision support system for cardiovascular diseases in rural India. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2014;2 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

132. Estabrooks CA, Squires JE, Cummings GG, Birdell JM, Norton PG. Development and assessment of the Alberta Context Tool. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9:234. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

133. McCormack B, McCarthy G, Wright J, Slater P, Coffey A. Development and testing of the Context Assessment Index (CAI) Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2009;6:27–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

134. Damschroder LJ, Lowery JC. Evaluation of a large-scale weight management program using the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) Implement Sci. 2013;8:51. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

135. Dyson J, Lawton R, Jackson C, Cheater F. Development of a theory-based instrument to identify barriers and levers to best hand hygiene practice among healthcare practitioners. Implement Sci. 2013;8:111. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

136. Melnyk BM, Fineout-Overholt E, Mays MZ. The Evidence-Based Practice Beliefs and Implementation Scales: psychometric properties of two new instruments. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2008;5:208–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

137. Nilsson Kajermo K, Boström A-M, Thompson DS, Hutchinson AM, Estabrooks CA, Wallin L. The BARRIERS scale—the barriers to research utilization scale: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2010;5:32. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

138. Jacobs SR, Weiner BJ, Bunger AC. Context matters: measuring implementation climate among individuals and groups. Implement Sci. 2014;9:46. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

139. Gagnon M-P, Labarthe J, Légaré F, Ouimet M, Estabrooks CA, Roch G, et al. Measuring organizational readiness for knowledge translation in chronic care. Implement Sci. 2011;6:72. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

140. Osigweh CAB. Concept fallibility in organizational science. Acad Manage Rev. 1989;14:579–94. [Google Scholar]

142. Michie S, Abraham C, Eccles MP, Francis JJ, Hardeman W, Jonston M. Strengthening evaluation and implementation by specifying components of behaviour change interventions: a study protocol. Implement Sci. 2011;6:10. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

143. Oxman AD, Fretheim A, Flottorp S. The OFF theory of research utilization. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:113–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

144. Bhattacharyya O, Reeves S, Garfinkel S, Zwarenstein M. Designing theoretically-informed implementation interventions: fine in theory, but evidence of effectiveness in practice is needed. Implement Sci. 2006;1:5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

145. Fletcher GJO. Psychology and common sense. Am Psychol. 1984;39:203–13. [Google Scholar]

146. Cacioppo JT. Common sense, intuition and theory in personality and social psychology. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2004;8:114–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

147. Kuhn TS. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press; 1970. [Google Scholar]

148. Greenwald AG, Pratkanis AR, Leippe MR, Baumgardner MH. Under what conditions does theory obstruct research progress? Psychol Rev. 1986;93:216–29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

What is the difference between a conceptual model and a theory?

Is theoretical and conceptual framework are interchangeable?

Which is an example of a theory that has been described as a grand theory in nursing?

How are theoretical and conceptual frameworks different quizlet?