Controlling measures the of actual performance from the standard performance


Controlling involves ensuring that performance does not deviate from standards. Controlling consists of five steps: (1) set standards, (2) measure performance, (3) compare performance to standards, (4) determine the reasons for deviations and then (5) take corrective action as needed (see Figure 1, below). Corrective action can include changes made to the performance standards—setting them higher or lower or identifying new or additional standards. Performance standards are often stated in monetary terms such as revenue, costs, or profits but may also be stated in other terms, such as units produced, number of defective products, or levels of quality or customer service.

Controlling measures the of actual performance from the standard performance
Figure 1. Five-Step Control Process

The measurement of performance can be done in several ways, depending on the performance standards, including financial statements, sales reports, production results, customer satisfaction, and formal performance appraisals. Managers at all levels engage in the managerial function of controlling to some degree.

The managerial function of controlling should not be confused with control in the behavioral or manipulative sense. This function does not imply that managers should attempt to control or to manipulate the personalities, values, attitudes, or emotions of their subordinates. Instead, this function of management concerns the manager’s role in taking necessary actions to ensure that the work-related activities of subordinates are consistent with and contributing toward the accomplishment of organizational and departmental objectives.

Effective controlling requires the existence of plans, since planning provides the necessary performance standards or objectives. Controlling also requires a clear understanding of where responsibility for deviations from standards lies. Two traditional control techniques are budget and performance audits. An audit involves an examination and verification of records and supporting documents. A budget audit provides information about where the organization is with respect to what was planned or budgeted for, whereas a performance audit might try to determine whether the figures reported are a reflection of actual performance. Although controlling is often thought of in terms of financial criteria, managers must also control production and operations processes, procedures for delivery of services, compliance with company policies, and many other activities within the organization.

Controls also come at a cost. It is useful to know that there are trade-offs between having and not having organizational controls. Let’s look at some of the costs and benefits of organizational controls.


Financial costs—direct (i.e., paying for an accountant for an audit) and indirect (i.e., people employed by the organization whose primary function is related to control—internal quality control, for instance).

Culture and reputation costs—the intangible costs associated with any form of control. Examples include damaged relationships with employees or tarnished reputation with investors or government.

Responsiveness costs—downtime between a decision and the actions required to implement it due to compliance with controls.

Poorly implemented controls—implementation is botched or the implementation of a new control conflicts with other controls.


Cost and productivity control—ensures that the firm functions effectively and efficiently.

Quality control—contributes to cost control (i.e., fewer defects, less waste), customer satisfaction (i.e., fewer returns), and greater sales (i.e., repeat customers and new customers).

Opportunity recognition—helps managers identify and isolate the source of positive surprises, such as a new growth market. Though opportunities can also be found in internal comparisons of cost control and productivity across units.

Manage uncertainty and complexity—keeps the organization focused on its strategy, and helps managers anticipate and detect negative surprises and respond opportunistically to positive surprises.

Decentralized decision making—allows the organization to be more responsive by moving decision making to those closest to customers and areas of uncertainty.

The management functions of planning, organizing, leading, and controlling are widely considered to be the best means of describing the manager’s job, as well as the best way to classify accumulated knowledge about the study of management. Although there have been tremendous changes in the environment faced by managers and the tools used by managers to perform their roles, managers still perform these essential functions.


The control function can be viewed as a five-step process: (1) Establish standards, (2) Measure performance, (3) Compare actual performance with standards and identify any deviations, (4) Determine the reason for deviations, and (5) Take corrective action, if needed.


Check Your Understanding

Answer the question(s) below to see how well you understand the topics covered in this section. This short quiz does not count toward your grade in the class, and you can retake it an unlimited number of times.

Use this quiz to check your understanding and decide whether to (1) study the previous section further or (2) move on to the next section.

Licenses and Attributions

What is measurement of actual performance in controlling process?

Measuring actual performance: If performance is not measured, it cannot be ascertained whether standards have been met. Comparing actual performance with standards or goals: Accept or reject the product or outcome. Analyzing deviations: Managers must determine why standards were not met.

What is standard in controlling process?

1] Setting Standards This is the first step of the control process. Before we begin any other work, the managers need to set the standards against which the actual performances will be measured. These standards, objectives, goals, targets etc. will be used to define the purpose of the firm.

What is the difference between standard performance and actual performance?

The term used to indicate the difference between standard performance and actual performance is 'Deviation'. On comparing Actual performance with Standard performance, the 'deviations' are revealed.

Why it is important to compare the actual performance with the standard performance?

Actual performance is compared with standards in the process of controlling to take corrective actions if significant deviation occurs.