II. INTERACTIVE MODEL Show Concepts of Schramm’s Communication Model Advantages Disadvantages III.TRANSACTIONALMODEL The main
drawback in the interactive model is that it does not indicate that communicators can both send and receive messages simultaneously. This model also fails to show that communication is a dynamic process which changes over time.The transactional model shows that the elements in communication are interdependent. In transactional model, senders and receivers both are known as communicators and both play equally important role in communication Post Views: 22,272 Wilbur Schramm, a well-known communication theorist, developed a straightforward communications model in his book “The Process and Effects of Mass Communications“. In the model, Schramm shown as Aristotle did, that communication always requires three elements – the source, the message and the destination. Ideally, the source encodes a message and transmits it to its destination via some channels, where the message is received and decoded. Schramm’s Model of Communication was postulated by Wilbur Schramm in 1954, where he suggested that communication is a two-way process where both sender and receiver take turns to send and receive a message. Information is of no use unless and until it is carefully put into words and conveyed to others. Encoding plays a very important role because it initiates the process of communication by converting the thought into the content. The Schramm Communication Model offers a classic approach to and explanation of communication. It can be used to determine how communication between two people works when they’re exchanging information, ideas, or attitudes. This model was adapted from the theories of another theorist Osgood, so it is also known as Osgood and Schramm Model of Communication or Encode-Decode Model of Communication. Thus encoding and decoding are the two most important factors of effective communication without which information can never flow between two individuals. Schramm’s Communication Model Schramm’s Model is as follows: Schramm’s Model has different parts for communications where
Note: From the message starting to ending, there is an interpretation that goes on. Based on this interpretation only the message is received. This model breaks the sender and receiver model it seems communication in a practical way. It is not a traditional model. When the information reaches the recipient his prime responsibility is to understand what the speaker intends to convey. According to Schramm’s model, coding and decoding are the two essential processes of effective communication. The Schramm Communication Model is a cyclical communication model containing all basic principles of communication. Advantage
Disadvantage This model does not talk about semantic noise and it assumes the moment of encoding and decoding. More PostLatest Post➤ What model of communication is twoTwo-way communication is a form of transmission in which both parties involved transmit information. Two-way communication has also been referred to as interpersonal communication. Common forms of two-way communication are: Amateur radio, CB or FRS radio contacts.
Who discovered two way process of communication?The two-step flow model was formulated in 1948 by Paul Lazarsfeld, Bernard Berelson, and Hazel Gaudet in the book The People's Choice, after research into voters' decision-making processes during the 1940 U.S. presidential election.
What is Schramm model of communication?The Schramm model views communication as a process that takes place between a sender (transmitter) and a receiver: there will be also a message, and a medium through which the message can be transmitted (Schramm, 1948).
What model of communication is a two way process where both sender and receiver take turns to send and receive a message?The interaction model of communication describes communication as a two-way process in which participants alternate positions as sender and receiver and generate meaning by sending and receiving feedback within physical and psychological contexts.
|