Which of the following statements best characterizes social movements and protests in China?

journal article

Democracy with Chinese Characteristics: A Political Proposal for the Post-Communist Era

Philosophy East and West

Vol. 49, No. 4 (Oct., 1999)

, pp. 451-493 (43 pages)

Published By: University of Hawai'i Press

https://doi.org/10.2307/1399948

https://www.jstor.org/stable/1399948

Read and download

Log in through your school or library

Read Online (Free) relies on page scans, which are not currently available to screen readers. To access this article, please contact JSTOR User Support. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

With a personal account, you can read up to 100 articles each month for free.

Get Started

Already have an account? Log in

Monthly Plan

  • Access everything in the JPASS collection
  • Read the full-text of every article
  • Download up to 10 article PDFs to save and keep
$19.50/month

Yearly Plan

  • Access everything in the JPASS collection
  • Read the full-text of every article
  • Download up to 120 article PDFs to save and keep
$199/year

Purchase a PDF

Purchase this article for $14.00 USD.

Purchase this issue for $24.00 USD. Go to Table of Contents.

How does it work?

  1. Select a purchase option.
  2. Check out using a credit card or bank account with PayPal.
  3. Read your article online and download the PDF from your email or your account.

Abstract

A fictitious dialogue is set in Beijing, June 3, 2007, one day before a constitutional convention on political reform in China. A professor of political philosophy named Wang defends a political proposal against the objections of a well-informed American democrat. After explaining why he rejects other proposals meant to reconcile democracy with rule by an intellectual elite, Professor Wang sketches out his own proposal for a bicameral legislature with a democratically elected lower house and an upper house composed of representatives selected on the basis of competitive examinations.

Journal Information

Promoting academic literacy on non-Western traditions of philosophy, Philosophy East and West has for over half a century published the highest-quality scholarship that locates these cultures in their relationship to Anglo-American philosophy. Philosophy defined in its relationship to cultural traditions broadly integrates the professional discipline with literature, science, and social practices. Each issue includes debates on issues of contemporary concern and critical reviews of the most recent publications. Philosophy East and West was founded at the University of Hawai'i in 1951 as an extension of a series of conferences on Asian and comparative philosophy inaugurated in 1939. The Ninth East-West Philosophers' Conference was held in Honolulu in 2005.

Publisher Information

Since its establishment in 1947, University of Hawai'i Press has published over 2,000 books and over 900 journal issues. Within the worldwide scholarly community, University of Hawai'i Press is recognized as a leading publisher of books and journals in Asian, Asian American, and Pacific studies. Disciplines covered include the arts, history, language, literature, natural science, philosophy, religion, and the social sciences. The University of Hawai'i Press also serves as a distributor for more than 140 scholarly publishers in North America, Asia, the Pacific, and elsewhere.

Rights & Usage

This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
Philosophy East and West © 1999 University of Hawai'i Press
Request Permissions