Nội dung chính Show Show
Recommended textbook solutionsConsumer Behavior: Buying, Having, Being13th EditionMichael R Solomon 449 solutions Statistical Techniques in Business and Economics15th EditionDouglas A. Lind, Samuel A. Wathen, William G. Marchal 1,236 solutions Human Resource Management15th EditionJohn David Jackson, Patricia Meglich, Robert Mathis, Sean Valentine 249 solutions Fundamentals of Engineering Economic Analysis1st EditionDavid Besanko, Mark Shanley, Scott Schaefer 215 solutions Recommended textbook solutionsSocial Psychology10th EditionElliot Aronson, Robin M. Akert, Samuel R. Sommers, Timothy D. Wilson 525 solutions Mathematics with Business Applications6th EditionMcGraw-Hill Education 3,760 solutions Myers' Psychology for the AP Course3rd EditionC. Nathan DeWall, David G Myers 955 solutions Mathematics with Business Applications6th EditionMcGraw-Hill Education 3,760 solutions Recommended textbook solutionsMathematics with Business Applications6th EditionMcGraw-Hill Education 3,760 solutions HDEV56th EditionSpencer A. Rathus 380 solutions American Government1st EditionGlen Krutz 412 solutions Statistical Techniques in Business and Economics15th EditionDouglas A. Lind, Samuel A. Wathen, William G. Marchal 1,236 solutions Recommended textbook solutionsMyers' Psychology for AP2nd EditionDavid G Myers 900 solutions Social Psychology10th EditionElliot Aronson, Robin M. Akert, Samuel R. Sommers, Timothy D. Wilson 525 solutions The Cultural Landscape: An Introduction to Human Geography, AP Edition13th EditionJames M. Rubenstein 216 solutions Social Psychology10th EditionElliot Aronson, Robin M. Akert, Samuel R. Sommers, Timothy D. Wilson 525 solutions Which doctrine holds that illegally seized evidence can be introduced at trial if the officials would have found the evidence anyways?Inevitable discovery is the law that states evidence that was found using illegal means could still be admissible in court if the evidence would have been found eventually anyway using legal means. Inevitable discovery basically means that the officers would have found the evidence legally eventually. What is another term used to describe probative evidence quizlet?Bad evidence is the term used to describe probative evidence, or evidence that proves (or helps to prove) that defendants committed the crimes with which they are charged. What is the bright line rule that came about as a result of the majority opinion given in Mapp v Ohio 1961?V. Mapp v. Ohio (1961) strengthened the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, making it illegal for evidence obtained without a warrant to be used in a criminal trial in state court. In which case did the US Supreme Court carve out the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule?The Supreme Court has narrowed the scope of the exclusionary rule in several cases since the late 1970s. In United States v. Leon, the Court created the “good-faith” exception to the exclusionary rule. What is another term used to describe probative evidence quizlet?Bad evidence is the term used to describe probative evidence, or evidence that proves (or helps to prove) that defendants committed the crimes with which they are charged.
What is the bright line rule that came about as a result of the majority opinion given in Mapp v Ohio 1961 )?V. Mapp v. Ohio (1961) strengthened the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, making it illegal for evidence obtained without a warrant to be used in a criminal trial in state court.
In which case did the US Supreme Court carve out the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule?The Supreme Court has narrowed the scope of the exclusionary rule in several cases since the late 1970s. In United States v. Leon, the Court created the “good-faith” exception to the exclusionary rule.
Which of the following is not a valid exception to the exclusionary rule quizlet?Which of the following is not currently an exception to the exclusionary rule? The exclusionary rule provides that evidence obtained by government officials in violation of the Fourth Amendment ban on unreasonable searches and seizures is not admissible in: a criminal proceeding as evidence of guilt.
|