journal article Show
Comparative Studies in Society and History Vol. 32, No. 4 (Oct., 1990) , pp. 629-659 (31 pages) Published By: Cambridge University Press https://www.jstor.org/stable/178956 Read and download Log in through your school or library With a personal account, you can read up to 100 articles each month for free. Get StartedAlready have an account? Log in Monthly Plan
Yearly Plan
Purchase a PDFPurchase this article for $34.00 USD. How does it work?
Journal Information Comparative Studies in Society and History (CSSH) is an international forum for new research and interpretation concerning problems of recurrent patterning and change in human societies through time and the contemporary world. CSSH sets up a working alliance among specialists in all branches of the social sciences and humanities as a way of bringing together multidisciplinary research, cultural studies, and theory, especially in anthropology, history, political science, and sociology. Review articles and discussion bring readers in touch with current findings and issues. Instructions for Contributors at Cambridge Journals Online Publisher Information Cambridge University Press (www.cambridge.org) is the publishing division of the University of Cambridge, one of the world’s leading research institutions and winner of 81 Nobel Prizes. Cambridge University Press is committed by its charter to disseminate knowledge as widely as possible across the globe. It publishes over 2,500 books a year for distribution in more than 200 countries. Cambridge Journals publishes over 250 peer-reviewed academic journals across a wide range of subject areas, in print and online. Many of these journals are the leading academic publications in their fields and together they form one of the most valuable and comprehensive bodies of research available today. For more information, visit http://journals.cambridge.org. journal article The Evolution of the Imperial Idea and U.S. National IdentityDiplomatic History Vol. 26, No. 4 (Fall 2002) , pp. 511-540 (30 pages) Published By: Oxford University Press https://www.jstor.org/stable/24914275 Read and download Log in through your school or library Read Online (Free) relies on page scans, which are not currently available to screen readers. To access this article, please contact JSTOR User Support. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.With a personal account, you can read up to 100 articles each month for free. Get StartedAlready have an account? Log in Monthly Plan
Yearly Plan
Purchase a PDFPurchase this article for $39.00 USD. How does it work?
Journal Information Diplomatic History is the official journal of Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations (SHAFR). The journal appeals to readers from a wide variety of disciplines, including American studies, international economics, American history, national security studies, and Latin-American, Asian, African, European, and Middle Eastern studies. Publisher Information Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. OUP is the world's largest university press with the widest global presence. It currently publishes more than 6,000 new publications a year, has offices in around fifty countries, and employs more than 5,500 people worldwide. It has become familiar to millions through a diverse publishing program that includes scholarly works in all academic disciplines, bibles, music, school and college textbooks, business books, dictionaries and reference books, and academic journals. Rights & Usage This item is part of a JSTOR Collection. How was the new imperialism of the 19th century different from earlier forms of imperialism?How was the "new imperialism" of the late nineteenth century different from earlier forms of imperialism? Instead of seeking colonies and trading posts, the "new imperialists" sought direct control over vast territories.
How did the new imperialism differ from old imperialism?Under New Imperialism, Empires were established in Africa and Asia and there were political and social reforms in those colonies. Old Imperialism led to exploration of new trade routes, establishment of new settlements in new lands and ultimately led to establishment of Political rule in those lands.
How was imperialism of the late 19th century different from imperialism in the 1450 1750 time period?Old imperialism lasted from 1450- 1750, but imperialism alone remained until 1914. Old imperialism and new imperialism shared the same basic concept of controlling and utilizing foreign countries. Old imperialism focused mainly on systems of trade while new imperialism took bolder steps to overtaking nations.
How was the new imperialism different from earlier expansion by European nations?How was the "new imperialism" different from earlier expansion by European nations? European expansion in Africa and Asia were limited to setting up trade posts, now European nations wanted direct control over vast territories. Imperialism? The extension of a nation's power over other lands.
|
How did the so called new imperialism of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries differ from earlier imperial traditions?
zusammenhängende Posts
Urheberrechte © © 2024 decemle Inc.
