Why did New England and the Chesapeake regions of North America develop so differently despite both being settled largely by the English?

Related

  • New England and Chesapeake Regions: Two Distinct Societies at the Beginning of the English Colonies in America

    In 1606, King James I created the Virginia Company to attempt to free England from dependence. Both the London and Plymouth group parallels were colonized and developed as English colonies. Despite the fact that the English settlers of the New England and Chesapeake regions had similar colonial development, by the eighteenth century they had become into two, individual societies. The gentries who settled the London group parallels and the Puritans who settled the Plymouth group parallels began to grow differently from the start, as their economical, leadership and social viewpoints arose. The severely different environments in the New England and Chesapeake area allowed for different economies to progress.

    • 825 Words
    • 2 Pages

  • Differences Between the Early Settlements of New England and the South

    These differences led to variations in government, religious practices, social culture, and most notably the economic variants of northern and southern settlements. One of the largest differences in the early settlements of New England and the south were the people who started the settlements. Massachusetts, settled by Puritans and Plymouth settled by Separatists were settled for the main reason of freedom from the Church of England. In comparison, the southern settlement of Virginia was founded by a joint stock company, the London Company, whose main interest was economic gain for themselves and for their investors. Though colonies of New England and the south were both originally settled by predominately Protestant founders, the colonies differed in values and purpose.

    • 797 Words
    • 2 Pages

  • Chesapeake Vs the New England Colonies

    During the late 16th century and into the 17th century two colonies emerged from England. The two colonies were called the Chesapeake and New England colonies. Even though the two areas were govern by the English, the colonies had similarities as well as differences. The Chesapeake and New England colonies grew into obviously distinct establishments. Difference in colonial motivation, religious, political structures, socio-economic, and race relation, were responsible for molding the territories.

    • 400 Words
    • 1 Pages

  • Economic And Religious Concerns Contributing To The Settling Of British North America

    Great Britain also sought to solve other economic problems through American colonization. For example, England needed to replenish some of its diminishing materials and assets, generate another "market" to export its cargo and merchandise, maintain its powerful navy and "merchant marine" through business with new American colonies, and to provide a new place for the unemployed to settle rather than escalating populace/crime and the economic burden in its own cities (Boorstin et al. 34). Though there were religious concerns that contributed to the settling of British North America, the economic concerns outweighed the notable religious concerns. A religious concern that played a role in British colonization was that the British wanted to have the Indians of North America converted to Protestant Christianity (Boorstin et al.

    • 1198 Words
    • 3 Pages

  • Chesapeake And New England Colonies

    New England, on the other hand, had developed into a religion and family based society comprised of mostly middle class families by 1700. Looking at the terrain, ethic, government, and even the people themselves, reveals clues about how the drastic split in society came to be. It was one America, but two distinct societies had developed in it by the 1700's. While residing in England, the Puritans and faithful Catholics faced prosecution, which led to their immigration to the New World. Most left England to avoid further harassment.

    • 1815 Words
    • 4 Pages

  • Society of Colonial America

    This paper would cite some of the elements from the 1620-1700 which is still evident today. One of the most interesting elements or legacies of the 1620-1700 is their concept of politics and order; also their concept of peace. This is well seen in the thirteen colonies as they introduced concepts such as voting, civil rights and social understanding with their fellow settlers and with Native Americans. They have also introduced rules and regulations regarding their territories and businesses both locally and internationally. A new government has also been formulated by several English settlers with their Native American counterparts because of the lack of consistency by the English government over the colonies and over the country.

    • 1262 Words
    • 3 Pages

  • Colonial Resistance Creates Unity

    Colonial America began in the early 1600’s when the European nations directed their focus toward the “New World,” a place of opportunity. According to Eric Foner’s Give Me Liberty, England’s motives for colonization were built upon national glory, profit, and religious mission (41). The purpose of the colonies in the New World was to import manufactured goods, produce marketable resources, and serve the interest of the mother country, England (Foner 74). Because economic circumstances in England were not great, England had a large proportion of men, women, and children willing to migrate to the New World and settle into the colonies. Nevertheless, after the British colonies were established, they were separated into three regions: the New England, Middle, and Chesapeake colonies.

    • 750 Words
    • 2 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited

  • Advantages Of Sustainable Crop Production

    FSustainable crop production is in contrast to industrial crop production, G which generally relies upon monocropping (growing only one crop in a large area of land), intensive application of commercial fertilizers, heavy use of pesticides, and other inputs that are damaging to the environment, to communities, and to farm workers. In addition, sustainable crop production practices can lead to higher yields over time, with less need for expensive and

    • 1181 Words
    • 3 Pages

  • Compare And Contrast Virginia And Massachusetts Colonies

    The main reason the governments of these colonies differ is the fact that the charter of Virginia created by the Virginia Company resides in England, or in other words it is controlled by the crown. On the other hand, Massachusetts’s charter, created by the Massachusetts Bay Company, resides in the colony, so the colony self-governs itself. This brings forth another comparison of the two colonies; the reason why they were founded. Both the colony of Massachusetts and Virginia were founded by companies looking to make money off the New World, but the founding of Massachusetts was motivated more by religious goals and family dynamics. Erin Bonuso, author of “Colliding Cultures”,

    • 926 Words
    • 2 Pages

  • The Distinct Differences Of New England And Chesapeake

    The Distinct Differences of New England and Chesapeake By the year 1700, the New England and the Chesapeake regions were both settled largely by people of English origin, although the regions had evolved in two distinct societies. The people who made the epic voyage to the new world came here for many different reasons. They wanted to lead the lives they wanted. Some were poor and needed money and saw America as a place to strike it rich. Others did not have the religious freedom they needed to practice their religious beliefs.

    • 1177 Words
    • 3 Pages

Why did the New England and Chesapeake colonies develop differently?

The New England colonies had a more diverse economy which included shipping, lumber, and export of food crops. On the other hand, the Chesapeake colonies economy focused almost exclusively on the production and export of tobacco and a few other cash crops.

Why did the New England colonies develop differently from the Chesapeake colonies quizlet?

Why did the New England colonies develop differently from the Chesapeake colonies? Religion was a much more important force in shaping New England society than it was in shaping Chesapeake society.

Why was life in the Chesapeake region different from life in New England for early settlers?

The main difference between the Chesapeake region and the Puritan region was that New England was more religion focused and the Chesapeake was more profit focused. The settlers coming to each colony also varied.

Why did the New England middle and southern colonies develop differently?

New England had poor soil and a cold climate, but plenty of forests and fish. The Middle Colonies had fertile soil, a warmer climate, and rivers for trans- portation. The Southern Colonies had an even warmer climate and many waterways in the tidewater.