Which would be the most useful source of evidence to support McNeills contention that the Safavi?

“Throughout the sixteenth century, the Safavi [Safavid] Empire remained a profoundly disturbing force in theMoslem [Muslim] world, dedicated to the defense and propagation of Shi’a doctrines at home and abroad.This policy implied a normal state of hostility with the Ottoman Empire, punctuated only briefly by periodsof peace. By the seventeenth century, however, when the Safavid Empire reached its apogee [peak] underShag Abbas the Great(1587-1629), the fanaticism of the Shi’a revolution had faded, at least in court circles;and a lasting peace with the Ottomans was concluded in 1639.”William H. McNeill,The Rise of the West, 1963

____ 34.Which would be the most useful source of evidence to support McNeill’s contention that “the Safavi[Safavid] Empire remained a profoundly disturbing force in the Moslem [Muslim] world”?

Name: ________________________ID: A____ 35.Today, Iran and Turkey are often political rivals. This passage suggests that this rivalry is based on historicalconflicts over

Which would be the most useful source of evidence to support McNeills contention that the Safavi?

____ 36.What brought an end to the “normal state of hostility” between the Safavids and Ottomans mentioned in thepassage?

“The Sultan’s hall was crowded with people, among who were several officers of high rank. Besides thesethere were all the troopers of the Imperial guard, and a large force of Janissaries, but there was not in all thegreat assembly a single man who owed his position to anything save his valor and his merit. No distinction isattached to birth among the Turks; the respect to be paid to a man is measured by the position he holds in thepublic service. There is not fighting for precedence; a man’s place is marked out by the duties hedischarges....It is by merit that men rise in the service, a system which ensures that posts should only beassigned to the competent... Those who receive the highest offices from the Sultan are for the most part thesons of shepherds or herdsmen, and so far as being ashamed of their parentage, they actually glory in it, and[boast] that they owe nothing to the accident of birth.”Ogier Ghiselin de Busbecq (1522-1590), Flemish diplomat at the court of Suleiman,Turkish Letters, 1555____ 37.This passage is best understood in the context of the Ottoman practice ofa.Allowing traders in occupied areas toserve as middlemen, profiting from the

Unit 3 QuestionsParagraph 1 Questions:1.Which would be the most useful source of evidence to support McNeill’s contention that the Safavidempire remained a profoundly disturbing force in the Muslim world?

Get answer to your question and much more

2.Today, Iran and Turkey are often political rivals. This passage suggests that this rivalry is based onhistorical conflicts over…

Get answer to your question and much more

3.What brought an end to the normal state of hostility between the Safavids and Ottamns mentioned inthe passage?

Get answer to your question and much more

Paragraph 2 Questions:1.The Songhai empire was like the empire of Japan because the Songhai…

Get answer to your question and much more

2. The Songhai empire under Sunni Ali was different from the empire under Askia the great because…

Recommended textbook solutions

Which would be the most useful source of evidence to support McNeills contention that the Safavi?

American History

1st EditionHolt McDougal

1,758 solutions

Which would be the most useful source of evidence to support McNeills contention that the Safavi?

World History and Geography

2nd EditionJackson J. Spielvogel

1,205 solutions

Which would be the most useful source of evidence to support McNeills contention that the Safavi?

World History and Geography Student

1st EditionMcGraw-Hill

1,670 solutions

Which would be the most useful source of evidence to support McNeills contention that the Safavi?

American Anthem

1st EditionDeborah Gray White, Edward L. Ayers, Jesús F. de la Teja, Robert D. Schulzinger

2,629 solutions

Which innovation helped both the Ottoman and Safavid empires rise to power?

Gunpowder Changed How Empires Fought and Expanded Their Territories. In the 15th and 16th centuries, the Ottomans, Mughals, and Safavid conquered the Middle East, South Asia, and large portions of North Africa and Eastern Europe. Advanced gunpowder weaponry, including firearms and cannons, made this conquest possible.

Which statement best describes the relationship between the Ottomans and Safavids?

Which of the following best describes the relationship between the Ottoman and Safavid Empires? The Ottomans favored Sunni Islam and the Safavids favored Shi'a Islam which resulted in violence between the two empires.

Which most strongly contributed to the historical development reflected in Father Simons description of the Safavid military structure?

Which most strongly contributed to the historical development reflected in Father Simon's description of the Safavid military Structure? Safavid intolerance for the Sunni population.

What brought an end to the state of hostility between Safavids and Ottomans mentioned in the passage?

What brought an end to the "normal state of hostility" between the Safavids and Ottomans mentioned in the passage? Safavid fervor for its brand of Islam slowly declined until the two empires stopped fighting.