Which types of diversification is more likely to be successful related or unrelated diversification?

Which types of diversification is more likely to be successful related or unrelated diversification?

What is diversification?

Diversification is a business development strategy in which a company develops new products and services, or enters new markets, beyond its existing ones.

Diversification strategy can kick-start a struggling business, or it can further extend the success of already highly profitable companies.

Why is diversification important in business?

There are four key reasons why businesses adopt a diversification strategy:

  1. The company wants more revenue
  2. The company wants less economic risk
  3. The company’s core business is in decline
  4. The company wants to exploit potential synergies

To learn more about how diversification works as part of a business development strategy, check out our in-depth blog on the subject.

For now, though, we’re going to look at some the best examples of business diversification strategy in action.

Apple

One of the most famous companies in the world, Apple Inc. is perhaps the greatest example of a “related diversification” model.

Related diversification means there are notable commonalities between the existing products and services, and the new ones being developed.

Once upon a time (1984), Apple launched the Macintosh personal computer. They had released products prior to this, such as the Apple I motherboard, but the Macintosh and related personal computing products defined Apple’s early success.

A period of decline hit the company during the mid-1990s, with Microsoft delivering a cheaper and simpler (albeit less powerful) PC alternative. Towards the end of the 1990s, Apple was approaching bankruptcy.

Then it all changed.

Which types of diversification is more likely to be successful related or unrelated diversification?

In 2001, Apple launched the iPod and subsequent iTunes software (2003). Later, Apple would truly hit the diversification jackpot with the launch of the revolutionary iPhone in 2007.

With modern smartphones and digital music players sharing features with computers, it’s easy to forget that, before the 2000s, computers and mobile phones bore next to no similarities from a consumer perspective.

But operational synergies in manufacturing allowed Apple to share resources and capabilities between the two product groups, as the smartphones Apple developed used many of the same resources and design principles as their computers.

Apple didn’t stop there, though. The company has since diversified into tablets, watches, smart-audio, and even electric vehicles.

Apple’s diversification strategy at the turn of the millennium not only saved the corporation from impending failure but helped them grow into one of the biggest corporations on Earth.

Amazon

Like Apple, Amazon is one of the world’s largest and most well-known companies, generating a mouth-watering $386 billion in 2020.

Amazon’s initial operation was that of an online bookseller, and it was a very successful one after its launch in 1995. Books were easy to source and distribute, but company founder Jeff Bezos always planned to diversify.

Which types of diversification is more likely to be successful related or unrelated diversification?

The website began selling videogames and other multimedia in 1998 and, before long, the company sold consumer electronics, software, homeware, toys and more.

The long-term goal of Amazon was always to diversify from an ecommerce website to a fully loaded technology company. Midway through the Noughties, Amazon launched AWS (Amazon Web Services), which delivers on-demand cloud computing platforms and APIs; suddenly they were a long way away from just selling books.

From web services and ecommerce to consumer electronics, Amazon diversified further as they launched the Kindle e-reader and later the Amazon Echo smart speaker system – in a remarkably similar trajectory to what Apple had followed previously, they also entered the digital music industry with Amazon Music.

Skip ahead to the present day, and Amazon has its own airline (Amazon Air), cloud storage platform, movie studio, and much more.

The diversification of Amazon is as impressive as it is concerning for competitors and is possibly the highest profile example of strategic relatedness in business diversification.

When Diversification goes wrong

Diversification is not a sure-fire way to ensure success. In fact, diversification as a business development strategy offers a considerably higher risk than product and market development, or increased market penetration.

This means it sometimes goes wrong.

Harley Davidson’s “Legendary Eau de Toilette”

That’s right, Harley Davidson, famous for its iconic motorcycles, diversified into the fragrance industry in the 1990s. A notable example of over-extending a brand, this perfume angered the Harley Davidson fanbase and prompted more careful diversification strategy from the company from then on.

The lesson: Be careful of brand clashes when diversifying.

Virgin Cola

The Virgin Group, which began selling records, is a fantastic example of long-term diversification strategy in action, with Virgin Media, Virgin Holidays and Virgin Money enjoying considerable success.

But even the best occasionally gets it wrong, which is exactly what happened when Virgin decided to take on Coca Cola and Pepsi with Virgin Cola. Virgin Cola only managed a market share of 3% in the UK.

Because of the size of the Virgin Group, they were able to survive and move on from this failure. Smaller corporations may not have done.

The lesson: When diversifying, be realistic about your product’s appeal against that of your competition.

Google Glass

Like Amazon and Apple, Google is a behemoth of a corporation, with near limitless budget, resources, and know-how. Despite this, they can also get diversification quite wrong – which is exactly what happened with their 2013 foray into wearable hardware, Google Glass.

Heralded as a wearable, user friendly, non-intrusive alternative to a smart-phone, Google Glass was discontinued after just 2 years after complaints about poor battery, privacy concerns, numerous bugs and even a ban from use in public spaces.

The lesson: Make sure your product is fit for purpose and has legitimate appeal.

How to get Diversification strategy right

Diversification is a high-risk business development strategy. When entering new markets with new products, preparation and planning is essential.

The “Three Tests of Diversification value” is a great place to start, and we strongly recommend asking yourself the following questions when thinking about diversification strategy.

  • Is it better to be specialised in your core business, or diversified?
  • Would diversification create or diminish value?
  • Is there an optimal degree of diversification?
  • What types of diversification are most likely to create value?

The Genus team at shorts recently took part in a special event with Lucidity, where we presented the dos and don’ts of diversification, and in-depth advice that can be applied to any company, not just the Silicon Valley tech giants!

You can watch the full video below – if you would like to discuss your diversification objectives with the Genus team, get in touch today.

Free Diversification Toolkit

Are you considering diversifying your business? If so, you can download our free, interactive Diversification Toolkit today. The toolkit gives you all the tools you need to decide if diversification is right for your business, and how to plan and effectively execute your diversification strategy.

Download the free Diversification Toolkit here

Generally, related diversification (entering a new industry that has important similarities with a firm's existing industries) is wiser than unrelated diversification (entering a new industry that lacks such similarities). Geographic diversification is another strategy to drive synergy.
Moreover, our results show that related diversification is more value-creating than non-related diversification, and that non-related diversification is likely to turn into a value-destroying strategy at lower levels than related diversification.

Which type of diversification strategy shows the best performance?

Figure 6.3 shows that the related constrained diversification strategy is the highest performing strategy.
One of the key advantages of related diversification is the ability to share key resources across different areas. Key resources and capabilities of the firm can be utilized in a new area – potentially giving the firm a competitive advantage relative to other firms that may not pose comparable resources.