Which of these is defined by a failure to exercise the degree of care that a reasonable person would exercise?

Which of these is defined by a failure to exercise three degree of care that a reasonable person would exercise under the same circumstances

Negligence is defined as a failure to exercise the degree of care that a reasonable person would exercise under the same circumstances.

Question

Asked 115 days ago|4/17/2022 6:16:04 AM

Updated 115 days ago|4/17/2022 9:49:20 AM

1 Answer/Comment

Rating

3

Negligence is defined as a failure to exercise the degree of care that a reasonable person would exercise under the same circumstances.

Added 115 days ago|4/17/2022 9:49:20 AM

This answer has been confirmed as correct and helpful.

Which of these is defined as a failure to exercise the degree of care that a reasonable person would exercise under the same circumstances?

Negligence is defined as a failure to exercise the degree of care that a reasonable person would exercise under the same circumstances.

Question

Asked 10/20/2020 4:12:22 PM

Updated 10/20/2020 4:45:00 PM

1 Answer/Comment

Rating

3

Negligence is defined as a failure to exercise the degree of care that a reasonable person would exercise under the same circumstances.

Added 10/20/2020 4:45:00 PM

This answer has been confirmed as correct and helpful.

Upgrade to remove ads

Only ₩37,125/year

  1. Social Science
  2. Law
  3. Civil Law

How do you want to study today?

  • Flashcards

    Review terms and definitions

  • Learn

    Focus your studying with a path

  • Test

    Take a practice test

  • Match

    Get faster at matching terms

Business Law Chapter 7 on Negligent Torts

Terms in this set (15)

Negligence

Failure to exercise the standard of care that a reasonable person would exercise in similar circumstances.
An action that is not done intentionally.
4 factors to succeed in an action of negligence:
1. duty, 2. breach, 3. causation, and 4. damages

Reasonable person standard

How a reasonable person would have acted in the same circumstances.
It is society's judgment of how an person should act.

Duty of landowners

Expectation of landowners to exercise reasonable care to protect individuals coming onto their property from harm.

Duty of professionals

An individual that has knowledge or skill superior to that of an ordinary person. An individual's conduct must be consistent with their status.
Malpractice - professional negligence that violates duty of care towards a client.

Causation

Must show that the breach caused the problem
1. Causation in fact - used to determine whether or not the injury would have happened as a result of the action.
2. Proximate cause - legal cause, which exists when the connection between an act and an injury is strong enough to justify imposing liability.

Foreseeable risk

Whether or not the damages as a result of the action were foreseeable.
Were the damages foreseeable?

Legally recognizable injury

Some loss, harm, wrong, or invasion of a protected interest that a plaintiff suffers.

Assumption of risk

Occurs when someone voluntarily enters into a risky situation. It is limited to expected risk.
2 requirements of assumption of risk:
1. Knowledge of the risk
2. Voluntary assumption of the risk

Superseding cause

An unforeseeable intervening event that breaks the connection between a wrongful act and an injury to another.
Relieves a defendant of liability for injuries caused by the intervening event.

Contributory negligence

A plaintiff who was also negligent can not recover anything from the defendant.

Comparative negligence

Enables both the plaintiff's and the defendant's negligence to be computed and the liability for damages to be distributed accordingly.
Compares the negligence of the plaintiff and the defendant.

Res ipsa loquitur

"The facts speak for themselves"

Negligence per se

"Negligence in and of itself"
An act in violation of a statutory requirement.

Good Samaritan statutes

Someone who is aided voluntarily by another cannot sue the Good Samaritan for "negligence".

Strict liability

Liability regardless of fault.
Doctrine that states that a person who engages in certain activities can be held responsible for any harm that results to others even if the person used the utmost care.
Applies to things such as wild animals and explosives.

Sets with similar terms

BUA 220 Ch.4 Pt.2

21 terms

Kdantilio

Business Law Cases and Text's Chapter 7

35 terms

DanielLegat

acct352 ch5

49 terms

jullllls74

BUL CH.9

30 terms

amam2014

Sets found in the same folder

Chapter 9 (Criminal Law)

30 terms

brandlid

Chapter 8 (Intellectual Property)

16 terms

brandlid

Chapter 6 (Intentional Torts)

23 terms

brandlid

Chapter 1 Terms

52 terms

brandlid

Other sets by this creator

Chapter 16 Terms

20 terms

brandlid

Chapter 15 Terms

5 terms

brandlid

Chapter 14 Terms

11 terms

brandlid

Chapter 12 Terms

26 terms

brandlid

Other Quizlet sets

Research methods

20 terms

ExtraGlama

COMS 252: Unit 3, Reading by West, COMS 252: Unit…

134 terms

Nea976

Photosynthesis

131 terms

Adriana_Assal816

Chemistry Multiple Choice Questions

58 terms

OllieCashmorePLUS

Related questions

QUESTION

What type of vehicle insurance is mandatory in NJ

11 answers

QUESTION

If the court overrules a defendant's objection to personal jurisdiction, do most states permit the defendant to raise the issue on appeal?

5 answers

QUESTION

TRUE OR FALSE: The basis of cost recovery property is reduced by the cost recovery allowed, and by not less than the allowable amount.

2 answers

QUESTION

What are 3 types of strict liability?

15 answers

What is the failure to use the degree of care?

The failure to use reasonable care that an ordinary prudent person would have used in a similar situation, resulting in harm or other loss.

What is the failure to act as a reasonable person would act quizlet?

Failure to take necessary precautions that would have been taken by a reasonable person will lead to negligence liability. The defendant's physical condition is taken into account when determining negligence.

What has been defined as not doing something that a reasonable person would do?

Negligence is the omission to do something which a reasonable man, guided upon those considerations which ordinarily regulate the conduct of human affairs, would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do.

What is the failure of taking reasonable?

5. Contributory negligence is defined as failure of a plaintiff to exercise reasonable care that legally causes the plaintiff's harm.