Screening can determine whether a person has a low or high risk of falls and assessment of risk can inform the development of prevention strategies. Show
Currently the National Standards require that all patients have a documented falls risk screen on admission to hospital and on transfer between settings. Examples of screening tools currently in use in Victorian hospitals include:
Experts emphasise that drawing on our clinical judgement can be equivalent if not superior to using these types of tools. Given this we should consider the following patients as having a higher risk of falling:
For all these patients, we should undertake falls assessment and provide one to one patient education. Assessment of falls risk and falls risk factorsEarly identification of falls risk factors enables us to tailor care and respond to each patient's individual needs. Whilst the evidence for multifactorial intervention based on risk assessments is weak in the hospital setting, identifying, exploring and addressing these issues will be of benefit to the older person. Assessment of risk factors should include assessment for individual risk factors such as:
Assessment for injury risk Assessment for the risk of injury (for example, fracture, head injury) also needs to be undertaken and we should consider:
Assessment of the environment Assessment of the environment is also vital. Scan the ward environment for hazards such as:
1. Stapleton, C., et al., Four-item fall risk screening tool for subacute and residential aged care: The first step in fall prevention. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 2009. 28(3): p. 139-143. 2. Barker A, Kamar J, Graco M, Lawlor V, Hill K. Adding value to the STRATIFY falls risk assessment in acute hospitals. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2011;67:450-7. 3. Oliver, D., et al., Development and evaluation of evidence based risk assessment tool (STRATIFY) to predict which elderly inpatients will fall: case-control and cohort studies. BMJ. British medical journal, 1997. 315(7115): p. 1049-53. 4. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, NICE Clinical Guideline 161. Falls: Assessment and prevention of falls in older people, 2013: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. A risk factor is something that increases a person’s risk or susceptibility for falling. Determining fall risk and making a timely referral to a healthcare professional familiar with assessment and treatment is recommended by a number of professional organizations. The complex nature of the deficits related to fall risk requires close case management and coordination of services (Moyer, 2012). The risk of falling increases dramatically with a number of risk factors, such as musculoskeletal problems, neurologic diseases, psychosocial characteristics, functional dependency, and drug use. Prevention is not easy because falls are complex events caused by a combination of intrinsic impairments and disabilities and, sometimes, environmental hazards (Baranzini et al., 2009). In her seminal study of risk factors associated with falls in older adults, Mary Tinetti studied multiple-modifiable risk factors and the effects of multifactorial interventions on the risk of falling among community-dwelling older adults. Tinetti’s research has shown that as the number of risk factors rise so does the risk of falling. The following risk factors were examined in the Tinetti study:
Researchers noted that a patient’s ability to compensate for loss of function declines sharply as the number of risk factors increases (Tinetti, 1994). Other studies have focused on these common risk factors associated with falls:
In the Veterans Affairs (VA) system, in addition to the factors listed above, these risk factors trigger a fall risk assessment:
A Taiwanese study involving 1377 community-dwelling adults 65 and older looked at co-morbidities, cognitive impairment, neuromuscular impairment, balance and gait disorder, depression, functional decline, higher use of medication, and environmental hazards. They noted that many older adults neither recognize risk factors for falls nor report falls to their physicians. Risk factors for falls only become evident after injuries and disability has occurred (Lin et al., 2011). Studies of risk factor assessment have used a large and varied list of risk factors for falls, which makes it difficult to synthesize the literature. One systematic review of risk factor assessments used in falls intervention trials found that three risk factors provided independent prognostic value in most studies: history of falls, use of certain medications (for example, psychoactive medications), and gait and balance impairment (USPSTF, 2012). Several risk factors for falls in older adults will be considered in more detail. PolypharmacyPolypharmacy is the use of multiple medications at one time, including over-the-counter (OTC) medications, dietary supplements, and herbal remedies. Polypharmacy includes prescribing more medications than are clinically indicated, using inappropriate medications, and using the correct medication for an inappropriate length of time (NHTSA, 2006; Pugh et al., 2005). Polypharmacy is regarded as an important risk factor for falling, and several studies and meta-analyses have shown an increased fall risk in users of diuretics, type 1a anti-arrhythmics, digoxin, and psychotropic agents (Baranzini et al., 2009). Due to concurrent prescription of several drugs, the risk of inappropriate drug combinations is increased in older adults. In addition, medication metabolism is affected by age-related changes, which increase both drug half-life and drug free fraction. Coexisting illnesses can also interact with medications. For all these reasons, older adults are at higher risk of experiencing adverse drug effects (Berdot et al., 2009).  An older man on multiple medications participating in a medication review. Medications that increase his risk of falling are of particular interest. Source: National Institutes of Health. Polypharmacy, arbitrarily defined as the use of four or more medications, may not to be an independent risk factor for falls in all settings. Polypharmacy has been discussed extensively and at length in the scientific literature, but the concept still lacks an unequivocal and clearly accepted definition. Attempts to establish a cut-off value for the number of drugs used, which might make it easier to identify patients at risk, have not always been successful. Even though a relationship between the number of drugs taken and the occurrence of drug-related problems has been demonstrated, such a relationship may not be universally valid and must always be considered in the context of the specific clinical setting and the peculiarities of the population considered (Baranzini et al., 2009). In a study that looked at polypharmacy and falls in nursing home residents in Varese, Italy, polypharmacy was not found to be a risk factor for fall-related injuries. Injuries were associated with the use of multiple drugs (7 or more), but only when a fall-risk-increasing drug (antiarrhythmic or anti-Parkinson drug) was part of the patient’s therapeutic regimen. Multiple medications or particular medication classes were not clearly associated with injurious falls. In particular, digoxin, type 1a antiarrhythmics, and diuretic use were associated with falls in older adults (Baranzini et al., 2009). Less well known is that fall risk increases significantly in the days following a medication change. In October 2004, researchers at Johns Hopkins University studied the effect of medication changes on the risk of falls among residents of three nursing homes who fell during 2002–2003. The study looked at medication changes that occurred 1 to 9 days before a fall, including the risk of falling after a start, stop, or dose change in medications. The results indicated that the short-term risk of single and recurring falls may triple within two days after a medication change (CDC, 2012a). To address these issues, the National Council on Aging (NCOA) Falls-Free National Action Plan encourages healthcare professionals to support policies that increase awareness of polypharmacy and fall risk. The goal is to “increase the number of older adults who have annual medication reviews conducted by healthcare providers or pharmacists and ensure this review includes an adequate focus on falls and fall-related injury prevention, with the goal of reducing or eliminating medications that increase fall risk.” To accomplish this goal, NCOA recommends that clinicians regularly review each patient’s medications for potential interactions and side effects that may increase fall risk and, where possible, reduce or eliminate medications or select alternatives. Reducing the number and types of medications, particularly tranquilizers, sleeping pills, and anti-anxiety drugs, can be an effective fall prevention strategy when used alone or as part of a multi-component intervention. Depression, Antidepressants, and FallsDepression is common and treatable in older adults and outcomes improve with effective antidepressant therapy, which could lead to a decrease in the morbidity associated with falls. Older people who fall are twice as likely to be depressed compared with those who do not fall (Kerse, 2008). However, antidepressant use can also increase the risk of falls, both for those in the community and in residential care (Kerse et al., 2008). A cross-sectional survey of Australians aged 60 and over investigated the association between depressive symptoms, medication use, falls, and fall-related injury. Both depression and the treatment for depression were independently associated with an increased risk of falls. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) use was associated with the highest risk of falls and injurious falls of all psychotropic agents (Kerse et al., 2008). Cognitive DeclineThe understanding of the relationship between age-associated declines in cognitive function and reduced mobility is evolving. For a long time, these two common geriatric symptoms were viewed as distinct and separate. An increased fall risk in older adults was typically considered to be unrelated to age-associated changes in cognitive function. New research gives us reason to suspect that falls are affected by cognitive function even in the absence of dementia (Mirelman et al., 2012). Several studies have examined the role of specific cognitive domains on fall risk. Lower scores on cognitive screening tests such as the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment were associated with an increased risk of falls (Buracchio et al., 2011). Lower scores on tests of attention, executive function, memory, and visual-spatial function have all been reported to be associated with an increased risk of falls in both cognitively intact and cognitively impaired individuals. Difficulty with dual-task walking, a measure of divided attention and executive function in which individuals are given a secondary mental task while walking, has consistently been shown to be associated with an increased risk of falls (Buracchio et al., 2011). Impaired cognition may cause these problems because of a limited ability to perform either task or problems in allocating attention efficiently between the two tasks (Shumway-Cook and Woollocott, 2012). An Israeli study looked at executive function, attention, and other cognitive domains in 256 community-living older adults with an average age of 76 years. Participants were free of dementia and had good mobility upon entrance into the study. Baseline cognitive function was established using computerized cognitive tests. Gait was assessed during single and dual task conditions. Falls data were collected prospectively using monthly calendars. The researchers found that among community-living older adults, the risk for future falls was predicted by executive function and attention tests conducted five years earlier, indicating that screening executive function will likely enhance fall risk assessment and that treatment of executive deficits may reduce fall risk (Mirelman et al., 2012). Cardiovascular DisordersCardiovascular complications are a significant cause of recurrent falls in older adults. Cardiovascular causes can be from neurally mediated syndromes such as orthostatic hypotension, syncope, or carotid sinus hypersensitivity. The cause can also be structural and can include abnormalities such as cardiac arrhythmias, valvular stenosis, cardiomyopathies, and myocardial infarctions. A study in The Netherlands involving 215 older patients (average age, 77 years) looked at echo (Doppler) cardiographic abnormalities to determine if certain findings were indicators of increased risk for falls. Risk of falls was increased if regurgitation of the mitral, tricuspid, or pulmonary valve was present. The level of risk increased according to the severity of the regurgitation. An increased fall risk was also found for high tricuspid-regurgitation velocity and high pulmonary systolic pressure, which was used as a proxy for pulmonary hypertension (van der Velde, 2007). Current cardiovascular status may be related to risk of falling. In a retrospective case-control study of 13 acute hospital patients who had fallen in the last year, researchers found that the fallers displayed a larger change in blood pressure and heart rate readings over 12 hours than those in the matched control group. In the control, blood pressure and pulse changed an average of 10% over 12 hours, while those who had fallen had a variation in their heart rate and blood pressure of approximately 20% (Freilich and Barker, 2009). Restraints and Fall RiskBecause unsafe behaviors such as wandering, aggressive behaviors, and falls are common among older adults in certain healthcare settings, it may seem like a good idea to restrain people to prevent falls. But physical and chemical restraints can actually increase the risk of falls and contribute to other negative outcomes such as bruises, musculoskeletal injuries, skin tears, physical deconditioning, pressure ulcers, anger, depression, and anxiety (Castle and Engberg, 2009). The topic of restraint reduction has been under intense scrutiny since the late 1980s, when it began with a public outcry in developed countries arising out of concern about the standard of care in long-term care settings. In Britain, the use of physical restraints on older people was regarded as abuse (Lai, 2007). In the United States, the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 (OBRA 87) established a resident’s right to be free of the use of restraints in nursing homes when used for the purpose of discipline or convenience and when not required to treat the resident’s medical symptoms. Related regulations also specify that uncooperativeness, restlessness, wandering, or unsociability are not sufficient reasons to justify the use of antipsychotic medications (Agens, 2010). Physical RestraintsA physical restraint is “any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material, or equipment attached or adjacent to the patient that the individual cannot remove easily and which restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one’s body” (Canadian Patient Safety Institute, 2007). Physical restraints have been used in nursing homes and hospitals both as safety devices and as falls prevention tools. Theoretically, a restrained patient cannot fall or, in the case of bedrails, cannot roll out of bed. Several studies have shown no statistically significant difference in falls compared with historical controls when bedrails are removed. In fact, restrained patients appear to have a modest increase in fall risk or fall injuries (CDC, 2012a). Restraint use can have significant negative outcomes—they have been shown to increase the length of hospital stays and increase mortality, pressure sores, hospital-acquired infections, falls, and aggression (Strout, 2010). Several studies have reported extensive injuries among nursing staff while applying physical restraints, as well as distress, anxiety, and anger among nursing staff when the need to maintain safety and control conflicts with their professional values (Strout, 2010). Despite evidence that restraints can increase the likelihood of a fall, a Hong Kong study (Lai, 2007) found nurses were resistant to the notion of removing patients’ restraints and how (or whether) it relates to fall risk. The study involved focus-group interviews with nurses in rehabilitation facilities and explored the perspective of the nursing staff with regard to the use of physical restraints, and their perception of the means available to reduce it. The nurses’ responses highlight the ambivalence many medical professionals feel when tasked with the responsibility of preventing falls among high-risk older adults: I am not worried about having to write an incident report (if a patient fell). Probably we would have to face the family. That is to say, they placed their relative under our care in the hospital, but then we allowed him or her to get hurt. They may put the responsibility on us. That is, they will blame us. It is not as simple as writing a statement. We will feel the burden. (Lai, 2007) In regards to staffing: In fact, really . . . we feel that there is nothing much we can do . . . in many situations, one member of staff has to look after two-and-a-half to three cubicles; one cubicle has eight beds, and there is one nurse and one healthcare aide looking after five cubicles of patients. Well, each of us has our work to do. Both the healthcare organization and I have the responsibility to prevent falls. For the sake of patients’ safety, well, we have to prevent them from falling, so we have to do everything . . . we can. (Lai, 2007) In regards to pressure from the hospital organization to perform: In fact the management is very important. . . . For example, when the ward manager comes around the unit and asks us to take off the restraints, even if we feel inside that this one cannot do without a restraint, we still need to try. The work that you have to do after a patient falls is considerable. Even if it is only a minor fall, the work that follows takes at least an extra hour. . . . You have to get the patient up, reassure him, get him back into bed, do your observations, and ask them about what happened. Then, if the patient needs treatment, you call the doctor. Probably you will have to arrange for the patient to have an x-ray, and then you will have to report it—you will have to write up a statement, update the patient’s record . . . and then you will have to inform the family, etc. (Lai, 2007) Reducing falls in high-risk older adults takes a commitment on the part of the healthcare organization to provide training, staffing, and equipment. It also takes a commitment on the part of individual healthcare workers and family members to educate themselves about fall-risk reduction strategies. Despite these difficulties the use of physical restraints can be significantly and safely reduced by making certain environmental and equipment modifications:
Chemical RestraintsA chemical restraint is the use of any medications to subdue, sedate, or restrain an individual. Chemical restraints are intended to restrict the freedom of movement of a patient—usually in acute, emergency, or psychiatric settings. Legally, a chemical restraint can be prescribed for dangerous, uncontrolled, aggressive, or violent behavior, but it must be used for the shortest time possible. As with physical restraints, chemical restraints have been shown to increase falls in older adults (Agens, 2010). Although an off-label use, antipsychotic medications in particular are often used in older patients to control unwanted behaviors such as hitting, yelling, and cursing. They become, in effect, a chemical restraint and have been shown to increase falls and patient deaths (Agens, 2010). An increased risk of mortality in older adults prompted the Food and Drug Administration to mandate a “black box” label on atypical antipsychotic medications stating that they are not approved to treat behavioral issues associated with dementia. Research suggests that conventional antipsychotics are just as likely to cause death, if not more so (Agens, 2010). Given the risks, if antipsychotic medications are used at all, they should be prescribed as part of a documented informed-consent process. Education of patients, family members, and staff about the harms of restraints is a good first step in a plan to avoid or eliminate their use (Agens, 2010). Back Next What puts a patient at risk for falls?The risk of falling increases dramatically with a number of risk factors, such as musculoskeletal problems, neurologic diseases, psychosocial characteristics, functional dependency, and drug use.
Which factors increase the risk of falls in a patient select all that apply?Risk factors include age, weakness on one side, the use of a cane or walker, history of dizziness or lightheadedness, low blood pressure, and weakness.
Which client is at greatest risk for falling?The risk of injury from falls is highest in people older than 65 years, and falls are the most frequent cause of accidental injury and death among older adults. Older adults account for 72% of total deaths resulting from falls. 22.
What factors contribute to clients risk of falling during a hospitalization?What can increase your risk for falling?. An unfamiliar setting.. Medicines that cause dizziness and confusion.. Illness, tests and treatments that make you weak and unsteady on your feet.. Lack of activity.. |
Which of the following would put the client at risk for falls select all that apply
zusammenhängende Posts
Urheberrechte © © 2024 decemle Inc.
