Which of the following is the most common reason for prosecutors to reject cases?

visualizations

Prosecutors are the government officials charged with investigating and prosecuting crimes. Prosecutors have near-unlimited power to make all the most consequential decisions in a criminal case from beginning to end. 

Which of the following is the most common reason for prosecutors to reject cases?

Charge

Prosecutors decide whether to charge & what to charge. The charge controls the sentence a person can receive & may lead to other consequences, like loss of employment, eviction, or deportation.

Which of the following is the most common reason for prosecutors to reject cases?

Bail

Prosecutors request bail often knowing that a person cannot afford it. Bail holds people in jail even though everyone is presumed innocent.

Which of the following is the most common reason for prosecutors to reject cases?

Evidence

Prosecutors have control over the evidence, and in most states, have a ton of discretion about when to turn over witness statements, police reports & other information to the accused.

Which of the following is the most common reason for prosecutors to reject cases?

Plea

All plea bargaining is controlled by the prosecutor. They decide whether to demand prison or offer probation or treatment.They also decide what charge the person will plead to.

pullquote

Justice Robert Jackson, United States Supreme Court Justice (1941-1954)

visualizations

The top prosecutor in a city or county is called the District Attorney or State's Attorney. These elected officials may have up to hundreds of "assistant" prosecutors in major cities. Each assistant makes decisions on multiple cases each day. The elected official has the power to inspire their staff to: Critically question accusations. Hold police accountable. Seek truth over convictions. Consider fairness over punishment. Think creatively and realistically about public safety without resorting to fear & rhetoric. Eliminate racial disparities.

copy

The United States is the only country that elects its top prosecutors. The electorate is supposed to hold these prosecutors accountable. But in reality, voters often do not know who their local prosecutors are or what they do in the courthouse.

With largely unchecked power, prosecutors have played a central role in the aggressive expansion of our criminal legal system; in the explosion in our Nation’s prison population; in the code of silence surrounding police misconduct; in the surge in the number of Americans with criminal records; in the tragedy of lives and families and communities whose potential is severely limited by those convictions.

video

pullquote

Yung-Mi Lee, Legal Director, Criminal Defense Practice at Brooklyn Defender Services

imageFull

copy

Just as prosecutors have the power to drive mass incarceration, THEY HAVE THE POWER TO END MASS INCARCERATION. Prosecutors make tens of thousands decisions every day, decisions that are invisible to the public. 

We need to understand these decision points in order to understand what we want from our prosecutors and how to demand that they fix the system. 

SO, LET'S BREAK THIS DOWN:

copy

The unique power of prosecutors starts at the very beginning. Whether to charge a person at all & what crime to charge. The charge determines the sentence  a person faces and controls the plea bargaining process.

The decision

The decision of whether and what to charge can send another person to jail; or it can change the system, send a message to the police and lawmakers, break our out-of-control cycle of overcriminalization, overpolicing and mass incarceration

Ideal CONSIDERATIONS: Do I charge this person at all? Do I charge a child as an adult? Do I file charges against a person clearly acting out of poverty, addiction, or mental illness, or do I instead refer them to services? Do I make charging decisions based on a person’s criminal record or the actual evidence before me? Do I charge knowing that the police conduct was likely illegal, or that a police officer has lied to me in the past?  Do I charge knowing that white and affluent people routinely engage in this same conduct with impunity?

Actual Considerations: Prosecutors are often focused on one question. What’s the most serious crime I can charge based on the alleged facts? This approach increases the chances of pretrial detention, determines the mandatory minimums that guide the case & limits the availability of treatment versus punishment.

video

copy

Once charged, prosecutors decide whether to request bail that will trap someone in jail pretrial, presumed innocent, until their case is over. Most judges follow the recommendation of the prosecutor when setting bail. 

The decision

A dollar number gets assigned based solely on the charge plus an often error-ridden criminal record. By requesting bail, the prosecutor will help ensure a judge adds to the half million humans detained pretrial nationwide. By consenting to release or forms of bail that will ensure freedom, a prosecutor can reduce pretrial incarceration immediately.

IDEAL CONSIDERATIONS: Is bail truly necessary to ensure this person’s return to court?  Are there other ways to ensure they return to court? Can this person even afford to pay bail? If not, what impact will pre-trial incarceration have on their life? Their job? Their housing? Their family? Their own safety? Should I seek pre-trial detention of someone who is legally presumed innocent? Should I investigate these allegations further first?

ACTUAL CONSIDERATIONS: All too often, prosecutors look at nothing more than the allegations and the person’s criminal record (if they have one) and then think to themselves: “We really don't know if they are guilty or innocent, but just in case they are guilty, let’s ask for bail.”  This presumption of guilt is driven by fear that a defendant might be the rare, anomalous person who  commits a new and terrible crime while they’re pending trial. 

video

copy

Prosecutors hold all the power in plea bargaining because strict sentencing laws with mandatory minimums have stripped judges of nearly all decision-making power. It's no wonder that 95% of all convictions are the result of pleas. People are afraid to assert their right to a trial.

The decision

Prosecutors are free to charge the highest possible offense with the highest possible mandatory minimums.The pain of pre-trial detention combined with the terrible risk of losing at trial will makes even innocent people plead guilty.

IDEAL CONSIDERATIONS: What outcome is most likely to help this person become rehabilitated, so that he doesn't reoffend? What will incarceration accomplish that non-jail alternatives will not? Given that most prisoners will eventually be released one day, how do I ensure this person can successfully rebuild his life?  Is a conviction even the best outcome for this person?

ACTUAL CONSIDERATIONS: How can we keep this person off the streets for as long as possible?

video

tabbedContent

The Power to Decline to Prosecute & Plea Bargain Compassionately

How will you prioritize decarceration in your charging decisions. How will you consider harsh consequences like loss of employment, housing, educational opportunity and the right to remain in the United States as a legal resident when deciding how to prosecute someone? What is your strategy for reducing the overrepresentation of people of color in the criminal legal system? How will you handle the cases of people who are struggling with addiction or mental illness?

The Power to Reduce Pretrial Detention

What will do you to ensure that no one is detained pre-trial only because they are poor? When considering whether to request bail, will you consider the consequences of detention to the person and their family, including the impact of the loss of a caretaker or breadwinner?

The Power to Promote Truth

Will you assure that witness statements, police reports and other evidence is provided to the defense early, and automatically? Will you turn over all such evidence before an accused is required to decide about a guilty plea? What will you do to make sure your staff does not withhold evidence? What will you do to review wrongful convictions? How will you reduce the likelihood of wrongful convictions of innocent people? Will you turn over the disciplinary records and any other reports of misconduct by the arresting officers to the defense? Will you conduct swift and thorough investigations of the evidence?

The Power to Heal

Will you consider incarceration as the last resort in plea bargaining? Will you create a wide range of options for people who have mental illness, abuse drugs, or have serious trauma in their past? Will you consider special options for women, young people, those with mental health issues, and other vulnerable populations? How will you supervise your staff to guarantee that they are using incarceration only as a last resort? To the extent you continue to seek prison sentences, what will you do to ensure jails and prisons provide education and skills so members of your community can successfully re-join society?

imageFull

What is the most critical decision that prosecutors make?

Prosecutors exercise the most discretion in three areas of decision making: the decision to file charges, the decision to dismiss charges, and plea bargaining. Once an arrest is made, a prosecutor screens the case to determine if it should be prosecuted or dropped.

What is the most important factor in deciding whether to prosecute?

The most important factor in deciding whether to prosecute is: if there is sufficient evidence for conviction. Most prosecutors have a screening process for deciding when to prosecute and when to "noll." Which of the following is a factor employed in this process?

Can a case be dismissed before trial UK?

The prosecutor has the right to discontinue the prosecution at any time before trial or up to close of the prosecution case. After that time, the prosecution can only be discontinued with the consent of the court.

Can you drop charges against someone before court Ireland?

Legally it is not up to the victim of a crime to drop charges, it is up to AGS or the DPP. Unless someone is acting as a common informer they do not press charges they make a complaint. Legally it is not up to the victim of a crime to drop charges, it is up to AGS or the DPP.