What projection (method) is demonstrated in the image below used to evaluate the cranium?

We’ve updated our privacy policy so that we are compliant with changing global privacy regulations and to provide you with insight into the limited ways in which we use your data.

You can read the details below. By accepting, you agree to the updated privacy policy.

Thank you!

View updated privacy policy

We've encountered a problem, please try again.

The skull is formed by the fusion of several flat bones held together by the cranial sutures. Each of the flat bones consists of a thick outer table, the spongy diploe, and a thinner inner table. The inner table is lined by a thick, fibrous, adherent dura mater. A shallow subdural space lies between the inner surface of the dura and the thin arachnoid mater that covers the surface of the brain.

A skull fracture is a break in the skull bone and generally occurs as a result of direct impact. The skull is deformed by localized impact, which may damage the cranial contents even when the skull does not fracture. If the force and deformation are excessive, the skull fractures at or near the site of impact. Uncomplicated skull fractures themselves rarely produce neurologic deficit, but the associated intracranial injury may have serious neurologic sequelae. A fracture indicates that substantial force has been applied to the head and is likely to have damaged the cranial contents.

Skull fractures may occur with no associated neurologic damage, and conversely, fatal injury to membranes, blood vessels, and brain may occur without overlying fracture. However, skull fractures may be associated with intracranial hemorrhage, which may create an intracranial space-occupying lesion. In addition, cerebral edema associated with skull fractures is a common and frequently fatal complication of head injury and may develop within minutes or hours of injury. Cerebral edema may accompany diffuse axonal injury or a space-occupying lesion, such as an intracranial hematoma. In children, brain swelling may be the only identifiable feature of head injury. Severe brain edema or a large intracranial hemorrhage may cause downward brain displacement and coning, which is usually fatal. [1, 2]

Anatomy

Skull thickness is not uniform, and therefore, the impact of forces required to cause a fracture depends on the site of the impact. The skull is thick at the glabella, the external occipital protuberance, the mastoid processes, and the external angular process. The skull vault is comparatively thinner than the base of the skull. The skull vault is composed of cancellous bone, the diploe, which is sandwiched between the inner and outer tables and consists of the lamina externa (1.5 mm) and the lamina interna (0.5 mm). The diploe does not form where the skull is covered with muscles, leaving the vault thin and prone to fracture.

Skull fractures are more easily sustained at the thin squamous temporal and parietal bones, [1, 3, 4]  the sphenoid sinus, the foramen magnum, the petrous temporal ridge, and the inner parts of the sphenoid wings at the skull base. The middle cranial fossa forms the thinnest part of the skull and thus represents the weakest part, which is further weakened by the presence of multiple foramina. Other sites at risk for fracture are the cribriform plate, the roof of orbits in the anterior cranial fossa, and the areas between the mastoid and dural sinuses in the posterior cranial fossa.

(See the images below.)

What projection (method) is demonstrated in the image below used to evaluate the cranium?
Diagram of the cranium shows the anatomic layers.

What projection (method) is demonstrated in the image below used to evaluate the cranium?
Diagram of the skull vault shows the location of various collections of fluid and/or blood.

Linear skull fractures

Linear fractures, the most common skull fractures, involve a break in the bone but no displacement, and generally no intervention is required. These fractures are usually the result of low-energy transfer due to blunt trauma over a wide surface area of the skull. The fracture involves the entire thickness of the skull. Generally, these fractures are of little clinical significance unless they involve a vascular channel, a venous sinus groove, or a suture. Thus, complications include epidural hematoma, venous sinus thrombosis, and suture diastasis. (See the following images.)

What projection (method) is demonstrated in the image below used to evaluate the cranium?
Lateral skull radiograph in a child shows a long, linear fracture extending from the midline in the occipital region across the occipital bone into the temporal bone. The fracture is more radiolucent than the other sutures, has no serration along its edges, and is blind ending. At the blind end, it is more tapered than it is at the sutural or proximal end. Note the lack of branches.

What projection (method) is demonstrated in the image below used to evaluate the cranium?
Skull radiograph in a man shows a linear temporoparietal fracture.

What projection (method) is demonstrated in the image below used to evaluate the cranium?
Lateral skull radiograph in a child shows a long, linear fracture running across the occipital bone. Note its radiolucency and straightness and the lack of branches from it. This is not a vessel and not a known site for a suture.

A high-energy transfer, such as a blow from a baseball bat, may cause a depressed skull fracture, in which bone fragments are driven inward, with or without a breach in the scalp (see the first 2 images below). This fracture is usually comminuted (as exemplified in the third image below), with the bone fragments starting from the point of maximum impact and spreading peripherally. Most depressed fractures involve the frontoparietal region, because the bones in this area are relatively thin and because this part of the head is particularly prone to an assailant's attack.

Depressed skull fractures

A fracture is clinically significant and requires elevation when a fragment of bone is depressed deeper than the adjacent inner table. Depressed fractures may be closed or compound (open). Compound fractures may be exposed when they are associated with a skin laceration or when the fracture extends into the paranasal sinuses and the middle-ear structures. Depressed fractures may require surgery to correct the deformity.

Depressed compound skull fractures account for 42–66% of all fractures in children and for 9% of all fractures in children younger than 1 year. Dural injury can be observed under fractures; approximately 11% of pediatric depressed fractures are accompanied by dural injuries that resulted in intracranial lesions. [5]

What projection (method) is demonstrated in the image below used to evaluate the cranium?
Lateral skull radiograph in a child shows an occipital fracture. It has a sclerotic margin and is therefore likely to be depressed. This is an example of a nonaccidental injury.

What projection (method) is demonstrated in the image below used to evaluate the cranium?
Plain radiographs of the head of a 25–year-old man who was assaulted with a baseball bat show a curvilinear shadow indicating a depressed fracture.

What projection (method) is demonstrated in the image below used to evaluate the cranium?
Axial computed tomography scan demonstrates an open comminuted and depressed frontal bone fracture with clotted blood along the interhemispheric fissure. Contusional hemorrhage is present in the left frontal lobe, as is a left-sided temporal extradural hematoma containing a small pocket of air; this finding implies an open fracture. The temporal horns are slightly dilated, suggesting the development of hydrocephalus.

Diastatic skull fractures

Diastatic fractures occur along the suture lines and usually affect newborns and infants in whom suture fusion has not yet occurred. In this type of fracture, the normal suture lines are widened (see the images below).

What projection (method) is demonstrated in the image below used to evaluate the cranium?
Postmortem radiograph in a child with multiple fractures due to nonaccidental trauma show a diastatic fracture of the sagittal suture.

What projection (method) is demonstrated in the image below used to evaluate the cranium?
Postmortem radiograph in a child with multiple fractures due to nonaccidental trauma shows a diastatic fracture of the sagittal suture.

Basilar skull fractures

Basilar skull fractures (BSFs) are the most serious and involve a linear break in the bone at the base of the skull. Most basilar fractures occur at 2 specific anatomic locations—namely, the temporal region and the occipital condylar region. These fractures are often associated with dural tears, of which cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea and otorrhea are known complications. Such patients usually require close observation in the hospital.

Temporal fractures are divided into 3 subtypes: longitudinal, transverse, and mixed. [3] The longitudinal fracture is the most common subtype (70-90%) and involves the squamous part of the temporal bone, the superior wall of the external auditory canal, and the tegmen tympani. The fracture may run either anterior or posterior to the cochlea and labyrinthine capsule, ending in the middle cranial fossa near the foramen spinosum or in the mastoid air cells. Transverse fractures (5-30%) originate at the foramen magnum and extend through the cochlea and labyrinth, ending in the middle cranial fossa. As the name suggests, mixed fractures have components of both longitudinal and transverse fractures.

A retrospective review found a BSF prevalence of 26% in a group of 180 pediatric patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). The temporal bone was fractured in two thirds of the patients with BSFs, and CSF leaks were observed in one third of these patients. In this series, BSFs were indicative of a significant linear blunt force and were independent predictors of mortality. [6]

Occipital condylar fractures are generally the result of high-energy transfer from blunt trauma with axial compression, lateral bending, or rotational injury to the alar ligament. These fractures can be subdivided into 3 types based on the morphology and mechanism of injury [7] or, alternatively, into stable and displaced fractures depending on the presence or absence of ligamentous injury. [8] A type I fracture is due to axial compression injury, which results in a comminuted fracture of the occipital condyle. This fracture is stable. A type II fracture is caused by a direct blow, and although it is an extensive fracture of the basioccipital region, it is regarded as a stable injury because of the preserved alar ligament and tectorial membrane. A type III fracture is potentially unstable and regarded as an avulsion injury due to forced rotation and lateral bending.

Ping-pong skull fractures

The ping-pong skull fracture (see the image below) is akin to a greenstick fracture of the long bones in children. It occurs in the first few months of life and is usually caused by a fall when the skull hits the edge of a hard blunt object, such as a table. The skull appears deformed, with a shallow trench on the surface of the skull. The ping-pong skull fracture was first described in a newborn whose head was impinging against the mother's sacral promontory during uterine contractions. The use of forceps also may cause this injury to the skull, but this mechanism is rare.

What projection (method) is demonstrated in the image below used to evaluate the cranium?
Lateral computed tomography (CT) scanogram and axial bone-window CT scan demonstrate a temporal fracture. The CT scan shows slight inward bulging of the bone, but the inner and outer tables are intact. This is a classic ping-pong ball fracture roughly akin to a greenstick fracture in a long bone. This fracture only occurs in children because the skull vault is more elastic and less rigid than it is in adults.

Birth fractures

Caput succedaneum commonly occurs after vaginal delivery and is related to a serosanguineous effusion, which appears as a soft-tissue swelling over the presenting part of the skull. Caput succedaneum is a benign process that generally resolves within 2 weeks and usually does not require any form of imaging. However, a cephalohematoma may develop after an instrumental delivery and represents a subperiosteal hematoma.

In contrast to a caput succedaneum, a cephalohematoma is limited by suture lines. In addition, a cephalohematoma may be visible on a plain radiograph as a subperiosteal elevation. Birth skull fractures may occur as a complication of forceps or vacuum extraction. (A forceps injury is shown below.) Most are simple parietal linear fractures, but occasionally, they are more complex or depressed. In some cases, associated extradural hematoma, [9] subdural hematoma, or axonal injury is observed.

What projection (method) is demonstrated in the image below used to evaluate the cranium?
Computed tomography scan of an 8-week-old baby after forceps delivery shows a major insult to the left cerebral hemisphere, which is now atrophic. This scan shows hypoattenuating areas in the brain parenchyma, with dilatation of the ipsilateral lateral ventricle and a midline shift toward the atrophic side.

Growing skull fractures

In children, most skull fractures heal rapidly, with no long-term sequelae. However, in a small minority of children, a fracture may remain un-united and enlarge to form a growing skull fracture. Most growing skull fractures (GSFs) are located in the calvarium, but rare sites are the basiocciput and the orbital roof.

Most cases occur after falls, motor vehicle accidents, and child abuse. Cases related to difficult vacuum extraction and corrective surgery for craniosynostosis have also been described. In 1816, John Hopkins described an infant with GSF after a head injury. Since then, cases of GSF (see the images below) continue to appear in the literature, with various names such as a leptomeningeal cyst, traumatic meningocele, cerebrocranial erosion, cephalhydrocele, meningocele, and spuria.

What projection (method) is demonstrated in the image below used to evaluate the cranium?
Lateral skull radiograph in a child with a growing fracture. The mechanism of injury is usually a direct force applied to the cranial vault, resulting in the fracture, with tearing of the dura so that cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks to form a collection. Because the CSF is under pressure and pulsatile, a transmitted pulsation from the subarachnoid space into the extra-axial fluid collection causes pressure enlargement of the fracture.

What projection (method) is demonstrated in the image below used to evaluate the cranium?
Lateral skull radiograph in a child with a growing fracture. The mechanism of injury is usually a direct force applied to the cranial vault, resulting in the fracture, with tearing of the dura so that cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks to form a collection. Because the CSF is under pressure and pulsatile, a transmitted pulsation from the subarachnoid space into the extra-axial fluid collection causes pressure enlargement of the fracture.

What projection (method) is demonstrated in the image below used to evaluate the cranium?
Axial computed tomography scan shows a growing skull fracture nicely, depicting the widened fracture on the left and the fluid collection extending from the intracranial cavity into and through the fracture site.

The diagnosis is based on clinical and imaging findings; early recognition of growing skull fractures is crucial to prevent long-term neurologic sequelae. Hence, radiologic and clinical follow-up is essential in cases of head trauma.

Serial conventional radiographs of the skull show evolution of the initial diastatic fracture into a larger defect. Although plain radiographs are sufficient for diagnosis, brain CT scanning better defines the exact pathology. On CT scans, 3 types of growing skull fractures are described: types I, II, and III. Type I is a GSF with a leptomeningeal cyst, which may be seen herniating through the skull defect into the subgaleal space. Type II is characterized by a damaged lesion or gliotic brain. In type III, a porencephalic cyst can be seen.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is preferred over CT scanning for depicting dural tears early after the head injury and allows timely surgical intervention and prevention of growth of the fracture. Cranial Doppler ultrasonographic studies have also been used to achieve an early diagnosis.

A growing skull fracture poses a challenge to the pediatric neurosurgeon. Matsuura et al presented a case history of a 2-month-old baby boy who fell from his mother's arms and hit his head on the floor; he underwent radiography, MRI, and CT scanning before cranioplasty with dural plasty. Radiography at admission showed a diastatic fracture with a gap of 8 mm in the right frontal bone and a linear fracture in the right occipital bone. The diastatic fracture had increased to 25 mm on radiography performed 37 days after injury. Cranioplasty with dural plasty was performed on day 39. A combination of MRI and CT images enabled the edge of the dural tear to be plotted on a 3-dimensional image of the skull, which was used to estimate the location of the edge of the dural tear on the scalp. Excellent outcomes in terms of bony coverage and dural plasty were achieved. The authors recommended a combination of MRI and CT scanning for surgical repair of growing skull fracture in children. [10]

Scalp injuries

The scalp is made up of several tissue layers: hairy skin; subcutaneous fat and connective tissue; the galea, which is a thin fibrous layer to which the flat epicranial muscles are attached; a thin layer of connective tissue; and the innermost layer, the periosteum of the bony skull.

The scalp may be injured with or without a breach in its surface. Lacerations are particularly common, as the scalp is readily crushed and split against the underlying bone. Most scalp lacerations are linear because of the convexity of the skull. When injured, the scalp often becomes markedly edematous, and hematoma formation is common above or below the galeal layer.

Axonal injury

Minor jarring of the intracranial contents may cause concussion and a clinical state of transient loss of consciousness due to temporary neuronal dysfunction. Retrograde amnesia is common. With more severe injury, a cerebral contusion may occur; this is classified into 2 types: coup and contrecoup.

Coup-type contusion or laceration of the brain surface often occurs at the site of a fracture, especially if it is depressed. A blow to the head when it is free to move accelerates the head and causes cerebral contusion at the point of impact. At the primary point of impact, a bruise, abrasion, or laceration of the scalp is often present.

Contrecoup-type brain contusions occur when the head strikes a stationary object (eg, when the falling head strikes the ground). The head decelerates abruptly while the intracranial contents continue moving forward to the point of impact. The result is a severe contusion in a region opposite the point of impact. This contrecoup contusion is more severe than the coup contusion. A severe contrecoup force may also cause a laceration on the brain surface. Therefore, a backward fall causes contrecoup contusions at the frontal and temporal poles of the brain, whereas a fall on the side of the head causes contrecoup contusions at the opposite temporal lobe. Generally, a forward fall does not cause contrecoup contusions on the back of the brain because the interior surface of the skull is smooth at this point.

Missile wounds

Missiles can be subdivided into (1) low-velocity bullets, such as those used in air rifles, nail guns, stun guns (used for animal slaughter), handguns, shotguns, and shrapnel, and (2) high-velocity bullets, such as metal-jacket bullets fired from military weapons. Low-velocity and high-velocity bullet wounds are shown in the images below.

What projection (method) is demonstrated in the image below used to evaluate the cranium?
Axial computed tomography scans show penetrating injury from a low-velocity bullet. The entry site is the frontal bone; note the intracranial metallic bone attenuations, intracranial air, cerebral edema, and subarachnoid hemorrhage.

What projection (method) is demonstrated in the image below used to evaluate the cranium?
Computed tomography scans of the head show air in the cranium, intracerebral hematoma, and cerebral edema due to a high-velocity gunshot wound. The presence of the reversal sign suggests severe brain swelling and probably secondary hypoxic ischemic injury to the brain as a result of the pressure on the brain.

Missiles produce brain injury by causing laceration and crushing, cavitation, and shock waves. The injuries to the skull range from a graze to an entry wound and sometimes an exit hole (penetrating) or a depressed fracture, with results ranging from focal hemorrhage to extensive neuronal damage. Differentiating between penetrating and perforating skull wounds is important because of their different prognostic implications. A poor postsurgical outcome occurs in 50% of patients treated for perforating wounds, as compared with 20% of those with penetrating wounds. Additional examples of missile wounds are shown below.

What projection (method) is demonstrated in the image below used to evaluate the cranium?
A missile injury through the frontal bone associated with an intracerebral hematoma/infarction along the missile tract.

What projection (method) is demonstrated in the image below used to evaluate the cranium?
Computed tomography scan of a missile injury through the frontal bone associated with an intracerebral hematoma/infarction along the missile tract.

What projection (method) is demonstrated in the image below used to evaluate the cranium?
Computed tomography scan of a missile injury through the frontal bone associated with an intracerebral hematoma/infarction along the missile tract.

Stab wounds

Penetrating skull stab wounds are uncommon. Stab wounds are caused by knives, nails, spikes, forks, scissors, and other sharp objects. Skull penetration most commonly occurs in the thinnest parts of the skull, such as the orbital surfaces and the squamous portion of the temporal bone. Injury to the brain usually occurs in the path of the penetrating stab wound. Unlike missile injuries, stab wounds have no concentric zone of coagulative necrosis caused by dissipated energy, and unlike motor vehicle accidents, stab wounds cause no diffuse, shearing brain injury.

Stab wounds may cause an intracranial hematoma or infarct. Cerebral damage caused by stabbing is largely restricted to the wound tract. Stab wounds occasionally produce a narrow, elongated defect (a slot fracture); this injury is diagnostic when identified. However, in some cases in which skull penetration is proven, no radiologic abnormality is identified. A stab wound to the temporal fossa is most likely to cause major neurologic injury because of the thinness of the squamous temporal bone and because of the short distance to the brainstem and blood vessels.

The type of skull fracture sustained and the underlying brain injury depend on the variation in skull thickness and on the strength and angle of the impact. A stab wound nearly perpendicular to the skull may cause bone fragments to travel along the same trajectory as that of the penetrating object, it may shatter the skull in an irregular pattern, or it may produce linear fractures that radiate away from the entry site. Tangential stab wounds result in complex single defects, with both internal and external beveling of the skull and varying degrees of neurologic injury.

Nonaccidental trauma

Most fractures in children are a result of falls and bicycle accidents, but skull fractures in infants may originate from neglect, falls, or abuse. Nonaccidental injury or shaken baby syndrome is a major cause of skull fractures and head injury in infants. The classic syndrome is an infant with a mean age of about 6 months who has retinal hemorrhages, subdural hematomas, and absent or minimal signs of external trauma. Because the parents seldom volunteer a history of nonaccidental injury or shaken baby syndrome, this condition is difficult to document and diagnose. Examples of nonaccidental trauma are shown below.

What projection (method) is demonstrated in the image below used to evaluate the cranium?
Occipital skull fracture due to a nonaccidental injury in a toddler.

What projection (method) is demonstrated in the image below used to evaluate the cranium?
Lateral skull radiograph in a child shows an occipital fracture. It has a sclerotic margin and is therefore likely to be depressed. This is an example of a nonaccidental injury.

What projection (method) is demonstrated in the image below used to evaluate the cranium?
Postmortem radiograph in a child with multiple fractures due to nonaccidental trauma show a diastatic fracture of the sagittal suture.

What projection (method) is demonstrated in the image below used to evaluate the cranium?
Postmortem radiograph in a child with multiple fractures due to nonaccidental trauma shows a diastatic fracture of the sagittal suture.

About 25% of all patients with shaken baby syndrome die. Usually, the child is grasped around the chest by using 2 hands and repeatedly shaken with its head moving forward and backward, causing rotational acceleration/deceleration injury. Injuries most often observed in inflicted head trauma are subgaleal hematomas, skull fractures, subarachnoid hemorrhages (SAHs), subdural hematomas, and parenchymal brain injuries.

In an infant, anything but a nonwidely spaced simple linear fracture of the parietal bone should be viewed with suspicion and regarded as a nonaccidental injury until proven otherwise. Such fractures include depressed, stellate, comminuted, or other complex skull fractures. Some researchers believe that falls from a distance less than 3 feet rarely produce any kind of skull fracture and that skull fractures occur only with extremely violent forces. However, Plunkett demonstrated that simple and complex skull fractures can occur with short falls. [11]

Greenes and Schutzman showed that skull fractures may be asymptomatic and yet be associated with underlying dural or brain injury. [12] Young infants (< 6 mo) may have major cranial deformation due to an impact but no skull fracture because their skulls are malleable and elastic, whereas older children have more rigid adultlike ossified skulls and are more vulnerable to skull fractures.

Margulies and Thibault have shown that the fracture threshold for an infant is approximately 10% that of a child or adult. [13] A special pattern of bilateral skull fractures can occur when crushing forces are applied against the infant skull. Skull fractures cannot occur without impact of the head against a rigid object. They cannot occur with shaking.

Hobbs demonstrated that fracture characteristics found considerably more often in abused children were a multiple or complex configuration; depressed, wide, and growing skull fractures; involvement of more than one cranial bone; nonparietal fracture; and associated intracranial injury, including subdural hematoma. [14] Multiple injuries and an inadequate history assisted in diagnosing abuse. No fractures >5 mm on presentation were found after accidents, but 6 growing skull fractures were found in abused children. However, accidents usually resulted in single, narrow, linear fractures, most commonly in the parietal bone, with no associated intracranial injury. [14] The results suggest that in young children with skull fracture in whom a minor fall is alleged, it is possible to recognize abuse by considering the fracture alone.

Extradural hemorrhage

The temporal bone is usually the thinnest part of the skull. A fracture at this site may tear the middle meningeal artery as it passes upward within a groove between the inner skull table and the dura. A blow to the temporal bone may result in a tear of the temporal artery without a fracture (15%). An arterial bleed from a middle meningeal artery accumulates, forming a hematoma between the inner skull table and stripped dura; this is called an extradural hemorrhage, which acts as a space-occupying lesion. This accumulation can be immediate or delayed.

Subdural hemorrhage

Subdural hemorrhages are more common than epidural hemorrhages, and they are especially common in the elderly, children, and individuals with alcoholism. Subdural hemorrhages are not usually associated with skull fractures but may occur after sudden jarring or rotation of the head, a blow to the head, or a fall. Trauma to the head may be trivial. Movement of the brain relative to the dura, often associated with widened CSF spaces, causes shears and tears of the small veins that bridge the gap between the dura and the cortical surface of the brain. Blood from torn vessels accumulates over several hours and usually tracks extensively as a thin film over the surface of the brain. A small, self-limiting subdural hemorrhage may remain asymptomatic and be an incidental finding.

Subarachnoid hemorrhage

Subarachnoid hemorrhages may occur as a result of a ruptured intracranial arterial aneurysm or trauma. Traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage is usually associated with brain contusion or laceration. In rare cases, this type of hemorrhage is due to a direct blow to the side of the neck, which ruptures the vertebral artery as it enters the cranial cavity. This phenomenon is called traumatic basal subarachnoid hemorrhage and is most often due to a blow to the side of the chin or jaw in an alcohol-induced fistfight. The degree of traumatic force required to cause a basal subarachnoid is less than reasonably expected.

Intracerebral hemorrhage

Intracerebral hemorrhage may occur as a result of a ruptured atheromatous intracerebral arteriole, vasculitis, ruptured intracranial arterial aneurysm, or trauma. Traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage is usually due to extension of hemorrhage from surface contusions deep into the substance of the brain. Traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage may also be the result of rupture of small blood vessels deep within the brain due to shearing stress.

Preferred Examination

Imaging plays a vital role in the diagnosis and characterization of head injuries. Skull radiography is useful for imaging of calvarial fractures, penetrating injuries, and radiopaque foreign bodies.

CT scanning is an essential imaging modality in detecting intracranial lesions that require urgent surgical intervention, such as an acute subdural hematoma. Skull fractures are detected on plain radiographs in 5% of patients with mild head injuries, but the detection of a skull fracture on a radiograph is regarded as an indication for CT evaluation. Therefore, obtaining a radiograph can only delay the diagnosis of an associated intracranial injury. Because cervical spine trauma may accompany a head injury, radiographs of the cervical spine are indicated for many patients with head injury who have signs, symptoms, or a mechanism of injury that might result in spinal injury, as well as for those patients who are neurologically impaired. [15]

Masters et al developed and prospectively tested a management strategy for the selection of patients who may benefit from skull radiography after head trauma; the effect of this study was to shift the focus of imaging of head injury away from skull radiography and toward the recognition of intracranial pathology, as demonstrated by CT scanning. [16] They offered recommendations for selection of patients who should receive CT scanning following head injury.

CT scanning is increasingly being used to identify minimal and minor head injury in patients who may benefit from observation; clinical criteria have not proven to be consistently reliable for the identification of those with significant intracranial injury. MRI depicts nonsurgical pathology not visible on CT. In the assessment of complications, CT may be appropriate; however, MRI is useful in identifying vestibular hemorrhage and delayed complications of head injury.

In a study of preoperative CT scans in 141 patients with calvarial skull fractures, the number of fractured calvarial bones was found to be an independent predictor of outcome in traumatic brain injury  patients after early craniotomy. [17]

Ultrasonography is a noninvasive technique that may be useful for evaluating growing skull fractures and associated intracranial hemorrhage in infants. In adults, the orbit can also be assessed for soft-tissue injury by using sonograms.

Cerebral angiography may be indicated if a vascular injury is suspected and if the patient is stable, though CT angiography (CTA) or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) can be used to obtain similar information. CTA can be used for the evaluation of both intracranial and extracranial vessels. The American College of Radiology (ACR) has issued Appropriateness Criteria for imaging in cases of head injury (see Table 1). [18]

Table 1. Head Trauma--Adult. ACR Appropriateness Criteria Scales* [18] (Open Table in a new window)

Criterion

Skull X-ray

CT without IV contrast

CT with IV contrast

MRI

MRA

Comments

Minor or mild acute closed head injury (GCS ≥13), imaging not indicated by NOC or CCHR or NEXUS-II clinical criteria

1

2

1

1

1

Minor or mild acute closed head injury (GCS ≥13), imaging indicated by NOC or CCHR or NEXUS-II clinical criteria

1

9

1

5

2

MRI may be appropriate in the outpatient setting, but panel members disagreed on the appropriateness rating. 

Moderate or severe acute closed head injury (GCS < 13)

1

9

1

2

1

Short-term follow-up imaging of acute traumatic brain injury. No neurologic deterioration

1

5 1 2 2 CT without IV contrast can be used in patients with risk factors 

Short-term follow-up imaging of acute traumatic brain injury. Neurologic deterioration, delayed recovery, or persistent unexplained deficits

1

9

5

8

5

MRI is complementary if CT does not explain clinical symptoms. CT with IV contrast and MRA may be appropriate  in patients with suspected post-traumatic infarction

Subacute or chronic traumatic brain injury with new cognitive and/or neurologic deficit(s)

1

7

2

9

3

Suspected intracranial arterial injury

1 9 1 9 9 Either CTA or MRA can be performed, depending on institutional preference; MRI is is complementary, in conjunction with MRA; CT  is complementary, in conjunction with CTA

* Scales are designated 1-9, where 1, 2 3 = usually not appropriate; 4,5,6 = may be appropriate; and 7,8, 9 = usually appropriate.

NOC = New Orleans Criteria, CCHR = Canadian CT Head Rules, NEXUS-II = National Emergency X-Ray Utilization Study Clinical Criteria. 

Approximately 3-5% of children with minor head trauma have identifiable abnormalities by imaging, and typically less than 1% require neurosurgical intervention. [19] In fact, routine CT scanning for all patients with skull fractures may be unnecessary, because few patients with minor head injury develop a life-threatening intracranial hematoma that must be rapidly detected and surgically treated.

Noncontrast CT has a central role in screening for intracranial traumatic injury due to its wide availability, speed, and ability to detect significant hemorrhage, herniation, hydrocephalus, and fractures. Small hemorrhages may be missed by CT, although the sensitivity can be improved with multiplanar reformations. Three-dimensional (3-D) reconstructed images can also be particularly helpful in young patients to help distinguish fractures from normal or variant sutures. The most significant disadvantage of CT is the necessary exposure to ionizing radiation. This is of particular concern in pediatric patients because of the increased radiosensitivity of young tissues, longer lifespan, and overall greater risk of subsequent iatrogenic malignancy. The absolute incidence of induced lethal malignancy has not been definitively proven, but the estimated risk in children is 1/1000 to 1/5000 per cranial CT. [19]

Isotopic bone scans may be useful in children with suspected nonaccidental injury, as the scans may show fractures elsewhere in the body in various stages of healing. CSF rhinorrhea and otorrhea can be detected and localized by using overpressure cisternography with technetium-99m (99mTc) diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA). The ACR suggests that 99mTc whole body bone scans be used as a problem solving study rather than first-line assessment. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria for imaging in cases of head injury and suspected physical abuse in children is summarized in Table 2 below. [19, 20]

Table 2. Head Trauma. ACR Appropriateness Criteria Scales*  [19, 20] (Open Table in a new window)

Criterion

Skull X-ray

CT without IV contrast

CT with IV contrast

MRI

MRA

Comments

Minor head injury (GCS >13) ≥2 years of age without neurologic signs or high risk factors (eg, altered mental status, clinical evidence of basilar skull fracture). Excluding nonaccidental trauma. 

1

3

1

2

1

Minor head injury (GCS >13), < 2 years of age, no neurologic signs or high-risk factors. Excluding nonaccidental trauma. 

3

3

2

3

2

CT has shown to be low yield in the absence of signs or symptoms. It may be considered if clinical assessment is uncertain or indeterminate. 

Moderate or severe head injury (GCS ≤13) or minor head trauma with high-risk factors. Excluding nonaccidental trauma.  

2

9

2

7

4

Consider MRA if vascular injury is suspected. 

Subacute head injury with cognitive and/or neurologic signs 1 7 2 8 3 Consider MRA if vascular injury is suspected
Suspected nonaccidental head trauma 7 9 2 8 3 Consider MRA if vascular injury is suspected

Suspected physical abuse. Child ≤24 months of age. Neurological or visceral injuries not clinically suspected

9 5 1 6 N/A  
Suspected physical abuse. Child >24 months of age. Neurological or visceral injuries not clinically suspected 9 6 1 5 N/A  
Child with one or more of the following: neurologic signs or symptoms, apnea, complex skull fracture, other fractures, or injuries highly suspicious for child abuse.  9 9 1 8 N/A

CT is used in the emergent setting. MRI is typically performed in a nonemergent setting; consider MRI of cervical spine at the time of MRI brain imaging. 

* Scales are designated 1-9, where 1, 2 3 = usually not appropriate, 4,5,6 = may be appropriate and 7,8, 9 = usually appropriate. N/A = not applicable

Single-photon emission CT (SPECT) scanning, positron emission tomography (PET) scanning, and transcranial Doppler ultrasonography have complementary roles in the assessment of brain injury.

Limitations of Techniques

Conventional radiographs do not help in assessing intracranial complications associated with skull fractures. In addition, temporal bone fractures may be easily missed.

Temporal bone CT scanning requires additional imaging time and patient cooperation, neither of which may be possible in the immediate posttraumatic period. CT scanning cannot be used to distinguish between CSF and hemorrhage in the middle ear. CT scanning does involve exposure to x-ray radiation, but the benefit of an accurate diagnosis far outweighs the risk. The effective radiation dose from this procedure is about 2 millisievert (mSv), which is about the same as that which the average person receives from background radiation in 8 months. This dose is equal to the radiation dose of 100 posteroanterior (PA) chest radiographs.

MRI has limited availability in the acute trauma setting, long imaging times, sensitivity to patient motion, incompatibility with various medical and life-support devices, and relative insensitivity to subarachnoid hemorrhage. Other disadvantages include the need for MRI-specific monitoring equipment and ventilators and the risk associated with imaging patients with certain indwelling devices or foreign bodies. Some of these limitations can be overcome by placing the MRI unit close to emergency care areas, with appropriate design and equipment for the management of acutely injured patients. The development of wide-bore magnets, fast imaging protocols, and MRI-compatible resuscitation equipment promises a greater role for MRI in the evaluation of closed head injuries.

Cisternography with 99mTc DTPA may not be immediately available, as this study is expensive and cumbersome. Cerebral angiography is an invasive procedure and generally performed only in patients in stable condition.

Other Problems to Be Considered

Sutures may be confused with fractures. Sutures are winding, serpiginous lines; less than 2 mm in width, with same width throughout; and don't run in a straight line. Well-corticated sclerotic margins are symmetrical, with standard anatomic locations. (See the images below.)

What projection (method) is demonstrated in the image below used to evaluate the cranium?
Lateral skull radiograph shows the importance of having the patient positioned straight for lateral imaging. Because the patient is slightly malpositioned, both coronal sutures are seen as separate entities. This problem also applies to the lambdoid sutures; because they are separated, one could be mistaken for a fracture. Accessory occipital sutures are also exaggerated by the patient's rotation.

What projection (method) is demonstrated in the image below used to evaluate the cranium?
Anteroposterior (AP) skull radiograph in a child shows the sagittal and lambdoid sutures and a prominent squamous cell suture on the right side. None of these are fractured, and all have serrated edges. The sutures communicate one with another; they are not blind ending. The child is probably younger than 1 year.

What projection (method) is demonstrated in the image below used to evaluate the cranium?
Lateral skull radiograph shows the normal bilateral squamous temporal sutures, not to be confused with fractures.

What projection (method) is demonstrated in the image below used to evaluate the cranium?
Frontal skull radiograph of a child shows the usual coronal and sagittal sutures. On the left is an accessory suture, which is seen to extend from the squamous central suture to the lambdoid suture. Although fractures and sutures can be difficult to differentiate, the accessory suture can be identified as such because it connects 2 sutures, has an even caliber and radiopacity throughout, and has slightly serrated edges. In general, when a fracture connects 2 sutures, the fracture line is wide open or open mouthed at the sutural connection and is narrowest away from the suture. In this case, the fracture line is of even caliber all the way across.

What projection (method) is demonstrated in the image below used to evaluate the cranium?
Frontal skull radiograph shows a persistent metopic suture that has not yet fused; this is not a fracture.

Vascular markings may also be difficult to differentiate from fractures. These markings engrave the inner table of the skull only, are less translucent than fractures, have ill-defined margins, and have symmetrical branching patterns. In addition, meningeal grooves taper as they run peripherally, and diploic venous markings are wide (see the following image).

What projection (method) is demonstrated in the image below used to evaluate the cranium?
Vessel markings simulating a fracture.

What projection (method) is demonstrated in the image below used to evaluate the cranium?
Frontal skull radiograph demonstrates a left-sided fracture. The fracture is radiolucent and wide, and it courses without interruption across the occipital and parietal bones. The other side shows a vascular marking of similar radiolucency, but it is of even caliber and its origin in the occipital region is from another vessel.

What projection (method) is demonstrated in the image below used to evaluate the cranium?
Lateral skull radiograph demonstrates a left-sided fracture. The fracture is radiolucent and wide, and it courses without interruption across the occipital and parietal bones. The other side shows a vascular marking of similar radiolucency, but it is of even caliber and its origin in the occipital region is from another vessel.

Special Concerns

Failure to recognize skull fracture has more consequences than the complications resulting from treatment. About 15% of patients with skull fractures sustain concomitant injury to the cervical spine; therefore, missing such a fracture has both clinical and medicolegal implications.

In infants and children, a simple linear fracture may be associated with a dural tear, which can lead to subepicranial hygroma or a growing skull fracture. This complication may take up to 6 months to develop, and hence, close radiologic follow-up is important in these patients. In addition, a fracture line crossing a vascular groove may be associated with an epidural hematoma; therefore, recognition of this possibility is important, as the hematoma may need surgical drainage. Similarly, a fracture line that crosses over a suture may cause sutural diastasis and a growing fracture.

A complete and sudden onset of facial palsy at the time of fracture is usually secondary to nerve transection, and patients in this condition have a poor prognosis. Moreover, a sphenoid bone fracture may affect cranial nerves III, IV, and VI, and it also may disrupt the internal carotid artery. In rare cases, pseudoaneurysm formation and caroticocavernous fistulas occur as complications. Therefore, efforts should be made to recognize these complications early.

The risk of epilepsy after a depressed fracture is low, but the risk increases when patients lose consciousness for longer than 2 hours and when they have associated dural tears. Dural tears can be recognized on imaging, and therefore, it is important to make this distinction from both the therapeutic and prognostic point of view. In addition, basilar skull fractures with CSF leak pose a risk of meningitis if the CSF leak is chronic and not repaired.

Controversy exists regarding the need to elevate a depressed fracture and whether the choice to elevate a skull fracture is the surgeon's. From an imaging point of view, it is important to assess the degree of depression. Obtaining 3-D CT scan reconstructions may help in decision making.

Skull fractures pose a significant potential risk of underlying direct injury to the brain, CNs, and vessels. However, most skull fractures are linear vault fractures, particularly in children, and are not associated with epidural hematoma. Some skull fractures are associated with serious neurologic complications, and hence, the medicolegal implications of missing a primary fracture during the diagnostic workup can be serious as well.

Patients treated surgically for contaminated open depressed skull fractures should be monitored with repeat CT studies to check for abscess formation. Follow-up CT evaluation is also recommended when complications, such as seizures and infections, occur in association with skull fractures.

Preoperative angiography with a venous-phase image or MRA is indicated when depressed fractures overlie the dural venous sinuses. A retrospective review of 472 patients with blunt skull trauma concluded that an increased suspicion for dural venous sinus thrombosis (DVST) is warranted in patients with skull fractures with a low Glasgow Coma Scale score and recent fall from a height greater than 10 ft. [21]

Which cranial projection best demonstrates the frontal bone?

Skull PA Occipito-Frontal This projection demonstrates the frontal bone, crista galli, internal auditory canals, anterior ethmoid and frontal sinuses, greater and lesser wings of the sphenoid, and petrous ridges. Position of patient Prone with the vertical beam angled at 20 degrees.

Which method of examining the skull will demonstrate the petrous ridges in the lower 1/3 of the orbits the ethmoid and frontal sinuses and the Crista Galli?

Skull & Sinus.

Which of the following bones is part of the cranium quizlet?

cranium protects the brain and it composed of 8 bones: frontal bone, 2 parietal bones, an occipital bone, 2 temporal bones, a shenoid bone, and an ethmoid bone.

What is the central ray angulation for the Axiolateral oblique projection of the TMJ?

Positioning TMG SINUS MANDIBLE.