Brought to you by Dorothy Gallop, Edith LaChac, and Lisa Menasha. (From top to bottom, images from: srhabay.wikispaces.com; www.canter.net; ethics.lacity.org) The Canter Model of Assertive Discipline Assertiveness and insistence are at the focus of Canter's model. If, at first, these do elicit the desired behavior from students, well organized follow up procedures are brought into play. This model provides a very powerful system of corrective discipline. Canter's Key Ideas. Key ideas forming the core of assertive discipline are presented below. These provide a summary of the assertive discipline model.
The Need for Assertive Discipline. The subject of discipline is a matter of continuing and great concern in schools. Parents and community members see the need for the exercise of appropriate and effective discipline in schools as perhaps the major topic in need of urgent attention by school administrators. This is possibly the result of a general decline in society's respect for authority and parents' requirement that their children behave in an acceptable way in school. According to Canter, schools and teachers deserve part of the blame because of mistaken ideas about discipline have led educators to be hesitant in controlling behavior. Mistaken Ideas about Discipline. Mistaken ideas about discipline widely held by educators include:
Correct Ideas about Discipline. These mistaken ideas about discipline must be replaced, according to Cantor, by the following, if desirable conditions are to be effectively maintained:
The Basis of Assertive Discipline. Canter maintains that an assertive teacher is one who clearly and firmly communicates needs and requirements to students, follows the expression of these needs and requirements with appropriate actions and responds to students in ways that maximize compliance. However he or she at no time or in any way, violates the best interests of the students. A climate of care and support develops from what Canter calls "basic teacher rights" in working with students. These "basic teacher rights" include:
Canter is emphatic that teachers can incorporate with ease the basics of assertive discipline into their own teaching styles . He implies the following series of steps will lead to implementation of his ideas: Five steps to Assertive Discipline. Step 1. Recognizing and Removing Roadblocks to Assertive Discipline. Canter believes that all teachers are capable of being assertive when the need arises. However there are many "roadblocks" that teachers have to overcome, especially when expressing their behavioural requirements and gaining compliance from students. The use of assertive discipline begins with the recognition and removal of these roadblocks. The majority of these roadblocks involve the teachers' negative expectations of student behaviour. In short, teachers expect students to behave badly. We believe that such factors as their health, home, personality, or environment, mitigate against students from behaving well at school. This pessimistic expectation must be recognized as false andmust replaced with more optimistic expectations. Secondly, teachers must recognize the simple fact that they can influence the behavior of all students under their direction in favourable ways; no matter what the initial problems may be. Recognition of this fact helps remove the roadblocks associated with negative expectations. Teachers are advised to focus on the following realities:
Step 2. Practicing the use of assertive response styles. Canter differentiates three styles of response that characterize teachers' interactions with misbehaving students: 1. The Non-assertive Response. The non-assertive response style is typical of teachers who have given in to students or who feel it is wrong to place strong demands on student behavior. Teachers using this non-assertive style are passive. They either do not establish clear standards or else they fail to back up their standards with appropriate actions. They hope their good natures will gain student compliance. They are not firm or insistent and they end up resignedly accepting whatever the students decide to do. 2. The Hostile Response. The hostile response style is used by teachers who feel that they are barely hanging on to class control. They use aversive techniques such as sarcasm and threats. They often shout and believe they must rule with an iron fist or else they will be overwhelmed with chaos. Hostile responses produce several bad side effects - they hurt students' feelings; they provoke disrespect and a desire to get even; they fail to meet students' needs for warmth and security; and they violate two basic student rights: the right to positive limits on self-destructive behavior and the right to choose their own behavior, with full knowledge of the consequences that will follow. 3. The Assertive Response. The assertive response style, which should be practiced until it becomes natural in dealing with students, protects the rights of both teacher and student. With this style, teachers make their expectations clearly known to students. In a business-like way they continually insist that students comply with these expectations. They reinforce their words with actions. When students choose to comply with teacher guidance they receive positive benefits. When they choose to behave in unacceptable ways the teacher follows up with consequences that reasonably punish misbehavior. Examples of nonassertive, hostile and assertive responses: Example 1: fighting.
Example 2: talking out of turn.
Step 3. Learning to set limits. Canter makes this point clearly: "no matter what the activity, in order to be assertive, you need to be aware of what behaviors you want and need from the students". He would have teachers identify the specific behaviors they expect from students, such as taking turns, not shouting out, starting work on time, and listening to another student who is speaking. Once teachers have identified the inappropriate behaviours they should then make them clear to the students. Once inappropriate behaviour has been made explicit, the next step in setting limits is to decide consequences for both compliance and noncompliance. For compliance, verbal acknowledgment is usually sufficient. Dealing with noncompliance is more difficult but using assertive discipline is usually the most effective strategy. When dealing with inappropriate behavior, teachers should be ready with firm reminders of what students should be doing. Canter details several methods for setting verbal limits, emphasizing the following three techniques: 1. Requesting appropriate behavior, which is accomplished using:
Canter warns that demands can have unfortunate results and issues his one and only commandment associated with assertive discipline: 'Thou shalt not make any demand thou art not prepared to follow on through.' 2. Delivering the verbal limit using tone of voice, eye contact, gestures, and so forth: Tone of voice - this should be firmly neutral and businesslike. It should not be harsh, abusive sarcastic, or intimidating. Neither should it be mirthful, implying a lack of seriousness. Eye contact - for a message to have its greatest impact, teachers should look students straight in the eye. However, teachers should not insist that students look them back in the eye. Even though students look away, teachers should fix them with a direct gaze when verbally setting limits. Gestures - these add much to verbal messages, especially in societies where few gestures are used. Facial expressions together with arm and hand movements accentuate messages. However Canter cautions that fingers and fists should not be waved in students' faces. Use of student names - their use adds further impact to verbal messages, making them more powerful and penetrating. This is especially true for messages delivered over long distances, as across the room or school grounds. Physical touch - touch is unusually effective when used in conjunction with verbal messages. A hand lightly placed on a shoulder communicates forcefulness combined with sincerity. Canter warns, however, that some students react violently to touch, by pulling away abruptly or even thrusting back. They may also claim that the teacher has pinched or hurt them. 3. Using the broken record technique, involving insistent repetition of the original message, is especially effective when students seek to divert teachers from their intended message. Here is an example:
The broken record technique (in this case the repetition that 'we do not fight in this class') is maintained with firm, forceful but kindly insistence. Canter gives these reminders concerning its use:
Step 4. Learning to follow through on limits. By "limits" Canter means the positive demands you make of students. By "following through" he means the appropriate actions you take, either when students comply (positive results) or when they fail to comply (negative results). The important point is that students have already been made aware of the consequences, either good or bad, that will follow the behavior they choose. Canter presents the following guidelines for following through appropriately:
Step 5. Implementing a system of positive or favourable consequences. The previous step emphasized negative assertions and consequences. These are often foremost in teachers' minds. It is common for teachers to feel inadequate in dealing appropriately with them. However, according to Canter, the positive or optimistic side of the picture is even more important to the maintenance of good discipline. Successful involvement with students when they behave appropriately builds influence with the students, leads to a decrease in the amount of problem behavior and makes for a happier and more productive classroom. Here are some positive consequences suggested by Canter:
Beginning the year. Although an assertive discipline program can be implemented at any time, the first few days of a new school year are an especially favorable time to introduce the program. Canter make the following suggestions:
Comments on Canter's Model Canter's model of assertive discipline integrates ideas and techniques from several other models. These ideas and techniques include such items as 'behavior as choice', 'logical consequences' rather than the use of threats or punishments, 'positive reinforcement' for desired behavior, 'addressing the situation rather than the student's character', etc. However Canter's model has several unique features- its overall ease of implementation, its insistence on meeting teachers' and students' rights in the classroom, its emphasis on caring sufficiently about students to limit their self-defeating behavior and its insistance on gaining support from administrators and parents. And what of the model's shortcomings? Many teachers find fault with it. Many teachers complain , for instance, that it is too harsh, too aggressive, overpowering for younger children, demeaning to older students, so focused on suppressing bad behavior that it excludes emphasis on the building of values for good, responsible behavior. As with all other aspects of human interaction, different people have different opinions; no one approach will please everyone at the same time and in the same situation. Application of the Model Kris will not work Canter would advise Mr. Jake to do the following:
Further information regarding this model may be found in the following references: Charles, C. M. (1989). Building classroom discipline: From models to practice. Longmans Inc.: New York. 103-117. What is Assertive Discipline explain its principle and educational implications?Assertive discipline is a systematic and structured approach that assists educators to run an organised, teacher-in-charge classroom environment, developed by Lee and Marlene Canter in the 1970s. Due to the undesirable behaviour of students occurring in classrooms and teachers not being able to control it.
What are the principles of Assertive Discipline?Central methods of assertive discipline:
Make the rules very clear; don't be ambiguous. Catch students being "good." Recognize and support students when they behave appropriately. Consistently let students know you are happy with good behavior (be specific).
What is meant by Assertive Discipline?Assertive discipline is a systematic approach to behavior management that requires that teachers set the rules, maintain a balance between positive and negative consequences, and be assertive in their verbal communication to make their wants and needs known to the students, parents, and principals.
What are the advantages of Assertive Discipline?'Assertive Discipline removes the teacher from the negative side of the discipline process because assertive teachers do not levy consequences. Students choose them. Assertive 42 EDUCATION 3 TO 13 JUNE 1999 Page 2 teachers do not punish students. Students are taught to accept the consequences for their own actions.
|