What contradiction do you find in the principle of unity of command and the technique of functional Foremanship and why?

When a worker or group of workers may have to receive order or orders from the line of supervisor as well as the staff specialist which may result in confusion among the workers and conflicting orders from multiple authorities may cause confusion and disturbance. ✔️

What is the positive effect of unity of command? The merits or advantages of unity of command are listed as follows: Better relationship among superior and subordinates. Clear and well-organized Authority, Responsibility and Accountability. Reduces and/or avoids duplication of work.

Hereof How many managers are in the principle of unity of command? Definition and Principles of Unity of Command

Unity of command provides that an employee is responsible to only one supervisor, who in turn is responsible to only one supervisor, and so on up the organizational hierarchy.

What violates the principle of unity of command? The principle of unity of command is violated under functional organisation . … Thus unity of command is violated among functional organisation . This type of organisational structure overcomes the disadvantages of pure line organisational structure .

Which organization violates the principle of unity?

Matrix structure violates Unity of command principles of management.

What is significance of unity of command as a principle of organisation? Unity of command provides that an employee is responsible to only one supervisor, who in turn is responsible to only one supervisor, and so on up the organizational hierarchy. This is true even if the top of the organization is led by a group of people.

Who gave the principle of unity of command? Henry Fayol: “For action whatsoever, an employee should receive orders from one superior only.” Pfiffner and Presthus: “The concept of unity of command requires that every member of an organisation should report to one, and only one leader.”

What are the factors affecting unity of command? In the opinion of Fayol the crucial aspects of unity of command are- there must exist an authority who has the power or right to issue order, the power to extract obedience, and there is an atmosphere of implementation.

Why is unity of command important to law enforcement?

Unity of command is a principle of management that provides a hierarchy of subordination. It ensures the responsibility of an employee to only one supervisor.

Who is the advocate of principle of unity of command? Unity of command implies that in organisations, employees should rcceive orders only from one superior. According to Henri Fayol, an ardent advocate of this principle, it means that ‘an employee shauld receive orders from one superior-only’.

What is the basic difference between unity of command and functional Foremanship? Unity of command is when a worker follows the order of the boss at a time while functional foreman-ship is when a worker gets order under two departments like ( production and planning ) from different boss.

Why does the principle of unity of command not hold good in an Organisation using Techniqueal Foremanship? Principle of untiy of command not hold good in the case of functional foremanship because according to the principle of Unity of Command, any person should be answerable to just one boss. If an individual receives command from two or more people then, this principle is violated.

What is unity of command answer in one sentence?

Principle of unity of command is a principle of management which states that each employee in the organisation should receive orders only from one superior.

How is Unity of Command different from Centralisation?

Unity of Command proclaims that each employee is accountable to one supervisor and thus, get orders from him, relating to the task to be performed.

Comparison Chart.

Basis for Comparison Unity of Command Unity of Direction
Purpose To prevent dual subordination. To prevent activities overlap.


Jul 28, 2017

What is span of control and Unity of Command? The use of latest means of communications has hardened the span of control. The length of span of control has increased and the superior can control more subordinates. … Unity of command means that no individual employee should be subject to the orders of more than one immediate superior.

Which of the following statement belongs to Unity of Command? The principle of Unity of Command’ states that employees should receive orders and instructions from one boss only.

How does unity of command contribute to police organization?

Unity of command basically means that each police officer is only accountable to one superior officer at any one given time. … When a police officer has to answer to a very specific superior officer, the superior officer is motivated to ensure that all his task members adhere to departmental and federal policies.

Who introduced unity of command? Thus, it stands for single boss for each person or mono-command. Henry Fayol: “For action whatsoever, an employee should receive orders from one superior only.” Pfiffner and Presthus: “The concept of unity of command requires that every member of an organisation should report to one, and only one leader.”

What is difference between unity of command and unity of direction? Unity of command refers to a principle of management which states that one incumbent should get orders from and report to one boss. Unity of direction is a management principle which implies that all the activities with same objective must have one head and one plan.

What contradiction do you find the principle of unity of command and the technique of functional Foremanship and why? Answer Expert Verified. The contradiction in the principle of unity of command and the technique of functional foremanship is in the way a subordinate reports to his superior or boss.

What is the difference between unity of command and unity of direction?

Unity of command refers to a principle of management which states that one incumbent should get orders from and report to one boss. Unity of direction is a management principle which implies that all the activities with same objective must have one head and one plan.

Why did Taylor device the technique of functional Foremanship? To improve the quality of supervision of workers ,Taylor developed the idea of functional foremanship. … According to this technique,the factory manager is supported by planning incharge and product incharge and each one of them are supported by four specialist or foremen.

Which of the following organization structure provides unity of command in its working process? The main features of line organisation are as follows:

ADVERTISEMENTS: 2. The principle of unity of command is the most salient feature of this type of organisation. In simple words, the orders are received by the subordinates from one boss.

Is in direct contrast to unity of command? Unity of Command proclaims that each employee is accountable to one supervisor and thus, get orders from him, relating to the task to be performed. … In contrast to the unity of direction indicates that every unit of the organization should be aligned towards the same objective, through organized efforts.

Don’t forget to share this post with friends 🎮🎯

What contradiction do you find in the unity of command and functional Foremanship?

Expert-verified answer The contradiction in the principle of unity of command and the technique of functional foremanship is in the way a subordinate reports to his superior or boss.

Which of following contradicts with the principle of unity of command?

yes, Fayol's principle: unity of command is contradictory to Taylor ' technique:functional. foremanship as Fayol insisted that there should be one and only one boss for every individual. employee. whereas in functional foremanship Taylor suggested four foreman for planning and four foremen for execution.

Does functional Foremanship violate unity of command?

Whereas, in functional foremanship there are at least eight bosses under sub departments which are assigned to a single employee. This technique clearly violates the principle of unity of command as it is in contrast with what the principle says.

Why does the principle of unity of command not hold good in case of functional Foremanship?

Principle of untiy of command not hold good in the case of functional foremanship because according to the principle of Unity of Command, any person should be answerable to just one boss. If an individual receives command from two or more people then, this principle is violated.