Risk assessment and risk management review of recent advances on their foundation

Q: What are the 4 types of risk assessment?

Lets look at the 5 types of risk assessment and when you might want to use them..

Foundational Issues in Risk Analysis

Documents prepared in FRASG-led processes

Glossary of risk-related terminology

Inhaltsverzeichnis Show

Documents prepared in FRASG-led processes
Other current relevant scientific literature (Open Access)
Citation Formats
NGA-West2 Research Project journal, August 2014
Overview journal, January 1997
What is the foundation of the risk management process?
What are the 4 types of risk assessment?
What is risk assessment and management?
What is review in risk management process?

Core subjects of risk analysis

Fundamental principles of risk analysis

Foundations of risk analysis (discussion paper)

Other current relevant scientific literature (Open Access)

Safety Science special issue on Risk Analysis Validation and Trust in Risk management, edited by Floris Goerlandt, Nima Khakzad, Genserik Reniers.

An Emerging New Risk Analysis Science: Foundations and Implications, Terje Aven, Risk Analysis.

The flaws of the ISO 31000 conceptualisation of risk, Terje Aven, Editorial, Journal of Risk and Reliability.

Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation, Terje Aven, Invited review, European Journal of Operational Research.

Implications of black swans to the foundations and practice of risk assessment and management, Terje Aven, Reliability Engineering & System Safety.

How some types of risk assessments can support resilience analysis and management, Terje Aven, Reliability Engineering & System Safety.

Improving risk characterisations in practical situations by highlighting knowledge aspects, with applications to risk matrices, Terje Aven, Reliability Engineering & System Safety.

How the definition of security risk can be made compatible with safety definitions, Øystein Amundrud, Terje Aven, Roger Flage, Journal of Risk and Reliability.

Emerging risk – Conceptual definition and a relation to black swan type of events, Roger Flage, Terje Aven, Reliability Engineering & System Safety.

Abstract

This article gives an overview of the advances made in the field of risk assessment and risk management of geologic CO2 storage (GCS), since the publication of the IPCC Special Report on Carbon Capture and Storage in 2005. Development and operation of a wide range of demonstration projects coupled with development of new regulations for safe injection and storage of CO2 have led to development and deployment of a range of risk assessment approaches. New methods and tools have been developed for quantitative and qualitative risk assessment. These methods have been integrated effectively with monitoring and mitigation techniques and deployed in the field for small-scale field tests as well as large-scale commercial projects. An important development has been improved definition of risks, which can be broadly classed as site performance risks, long-term containment risks, public perception risks and market risks. Considerable experience has now been gained on understanding and managing site performance risks. Targeted research on containment risks and induced seismicity risks has led to improved understanding of parameters and processes influencing these risks as well as identifying key uncertainties that need to be targeted. Finally, significant progress has been made to effectively integrate communication strategies with risk management approachesmore »

Authors: Bromhal, G [2]; Carey, W [1]; Foxall, B [3]; Korre, A [4]; Ringrose, P [5]; Tucker, O [6]; Watson, M [7]; White, J A [3]

Los Alamos National Laboratory
NETL
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Imperial College
Statoil
Shell
CO2CRC

Publication Date: Tue Aug 04 00:00:00 EDT 2015Research Org.: Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States); Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)Sponsoring Org.: USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA); USDOE Office of Fossil Energy (FE)OSTI Identifier: 1840110Alternate Identifier(s):OSTI ID: 1251875Report Number(s): LLNL-JRNL-830559
Journal ID: 1047119; 1047119Grant/Contract Number: AC52-07NA27344; AC02-05CH11231; AC52-06NA25396Resource Type: Journal Article: Accepted ManuscriptJournal Name: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas ControlAdditional Journal Information: Journal Volume: vol. 40; Journal Issue: N/ACountry of Publication: United StatesLanguage: EnglishSubject: 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; 58 GEOSCIENCES; CCS; Risk assessment; Risk management; Geologic CO2 storage; Risk communication; Quantitative risk assessment

Citation Formats

MLA
APA
Chicago
BibTeX

Pawar, R, Bromhal, G, Carey, W, Foxall, B, Korre, A, Ringrose, P, Tucker, O, Watson, M, and White, J A. Recent advances in risk assessment and risk management of geologic CO2 storage. United States: N. p., 2015. Web. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.06.014.

Pawar, R, Bromhal, G, Carey, W, Foxall, B, Korre, A, Ringrose, P, Tucker, O, Watson, M, & White, J A. Recent advances in risk assessment and risk management of geologic CO2 storage. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.06.014

Pawar, R, Bromhal, G, Carey, W, Foxall, B, Korre, A, Ringrose, P, Tucker, O, Watson, M, and White, J A. 2015. "Recent advances in risk assessment and risk management of geologic CO2 storage". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.06.014. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1840110.

@article{osti_1840110, title = {Recent advances in risk assessment and risk management of geologic CO2 storage}, author = {Pawar, R and Bromhal, G and Carey, W and Foxall, B and Korre, A and Ringrose, P and Tucker, O and Watson, M and White, J A}, abstractNote = {This article gives an overview of the advances made in the field of risk assessment and risk management of geologic CO2 storage (GCS), since the publication of the IPCC Special Report on Carbon Capture and Storage in 2005. Development and operation of a wide range of demonstration projects coupled with development of new regulations for safe injection and storage of CO2 have led to development and deployment of a range of risk assessment approaches. New methods and tools have been developed for quantitative and qualitative risk assessment. These methods have been integrated effectively with monitoring and mitigation techniques and deployed in the field for small-scale field tests as well as large-scale commercial projects. An important development has been improved definition of risks, which can be broadly classed as site performance risks, long-term containment risks, public perception risks and market risks. Considerable experience has now been gained on understanding and managing site performance risks. Targeted research on containment risks and induced seismicity risks has led to improved understanding of parameters and processes influencing these risks as well as identifying key uncertainties that need to be targeted. Finally, significant progress has been made to effectively integrate communication strategies with risk management approaches to increase stakeholder confidence in effectiveness of deployed risk management approaches to manage risks.}, doi = {10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.06.014}, url = {https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1840110}, journal = {International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control}, number = N/A, volume = vol. 40, place = {United States}, year = {Tue Aug 04 00:00:00 EDT 2015}, month = {Tue Aug 04 00:00:00 EDT 2015} }

Free Publicly Available Full Text

Publisher's Version of Record

Cited by: 31 works

Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Works referenced in this record:

NGA-West2 Research Project journal, August 2014

Bozorgnia, Yousef; Abrahamson, Norman A.; Atik, Linda Al
Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 30, Issue 3

Overview journal, January 1997

Abrahamson, N. A.; Shedlock, K. M.
Seismological Research Letters, Vol. 68, Issue 1

All References
conference (2)
journal (103)

What is the foundation of the risk management process?

Good risk management utilizes a five-step process:.

Step 1 – Situational Awareness: Obtain information. ... .

Step 2 – Hazard Assessment: ... .

Step 3 – Hazard Control: ... .

Step 4 – Decision Point (decision to accept or not accept the risks associated with an action): ... .

Step 5 – Evaluation:.

What are the 4 types of risk assessment?

Let's look at the 5 types of risk assessment and when you might want to use them..

Qualitative Risk Assessment. The qualitative risk assessment is the most common form of risk assessment. ... .

Quantitative Risk Assessment. ... .

Generic Risk Assessment. ... .

Site-Specific Risk Assessment. ... .

Dynamic Risk Assessment..

What is risk assessment and management?

Risk assessment is a function within occupational safety and health (OSH) risk management that focuses on identifying potential hazards. The goal is to identify hazards, then analyze and evaluate the risks they create.

What is review in risk management process?

The overall purpose of the risk review and regular monitoring is to ensurerelevance of risk management treatment as well as progress made in the treatment plan and if there is any need to modify the plan if there is a major change in Both internal and external contexts around our intervention..