Kluckhohn and Strodtbecks relationship with nature classification ranges along a continuum from

HC - face-to-face relationships are important, long-term relationships,less written and formal communication, multiple ties and networks, knowledge is situational/relational, strong insider/outsider boundaries

LC - verbally explicit information, people play by external rules, knowledge is codified and accessible, task-centered, sequencing of activities, interpersonal connections of shorter duration, lots of written information

Sets with similar terms

What was the primary assumption of Kluckhohn and strodtbeck's value orientations approach for understanding cultural differences?

Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck's (1961) Values Orientation Theory proposes that all human societies must answer a limited number of universal problems, that the value-based solutions are limited in number and universally known, but that different cultures have different preferences among them.

How do the dimensions of Kluckhohn and Strodtbecks framework help us to better understand other cultures?

How do the dimensions of Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck's framework help us to better understand other cultures? They help us to further understand beliefs and actions in other cultures. patterns for public and private life. the degree to which people in the culture are integrated into groups.

What three elements are included in an anthropologist's definition of culture?

Understand the basic elements of culture: values, beliefs, and norms. Explain the significance of symbols and language to a culture. Describe the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis.
How you measure your success is related to which cultural orientation described by Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck? Members of collectivist cultures do not draw a strong distinction between ingroup and outgroup members. In high-context cultures, messages tend to be direct and explicit.