Is the extent to which a job allows an employee to make decisions about scheduling?

Is the extent to which a job allows an employee to make decisions about scheduling?

Promising Practice 2: Offer Employees More Control over Their Schedules

Schedule control involves providing employees with more say over when and where work happens.2 Changes in communications technology and the nature of work in the twenty-first century mean that employees often face increased work demands and 24/7 work environments. This has left many families struggling to integrate their work and family lives. Given these changes, workers’ ability to achieve greater schedule control is both more challenging yet more imperative than ever before. Stress that results from managing the conflicting needs of work and personal life has well-documented health consequences, including hypertension, sleep problems, higher levels of alcohol consumption, and other mental and physical health problems.4 Work-family conflict experienced by employees also hurts their employers and is associated with lower job satisfaction and higher turnover intentions.6

Schedule Flexibility

One key aspect of schedule control is schedule flexibility, or the extent to which employees can vary their working time (for instance, when they start and end the day) and work location in order to better manage their work and personal lives. Several high-quality studies of initiatives designed to enhance schedule flexibility have shown the value of this approach. One group of researchers found that mental distress decreased in hospital and call center employees who were allowed to choose from a range of scheduling options, including varied shift lengths or starting and ending times, and had the possibility of trading shifts with coworkers. Another high-quality experimental study to enhance schedule flexibility for employees in the IT division of a U.S. Fortune 500 company yielded a range of positive physical, psychosocial, and business outcomes. (See the “Less Stressed and Less Likely to Quit” case study listed below).

CASE STUDY: Less Stressed and Less Likely to Quit: When High-Tech Professionals Gain Control Over Their Work Schedules

Strength of Evidence: Strong 
Background: Executives in the IT division of a U.S. Fortune 500 firm were concerned that their highly skilled technical staff were “burned out” and at risk of leaving the company. In order to address these concerns, a research team was invited in to implement and evaluate a work design initiative called STAR that aimed to benefit both the company and its overstressed employees. The firm already had some flexible work policies on the books, but relatively few employees used those options. Employees felt pressured to work long hours, to be in the office whenever their bosses were there, and to be constantly available (via smartphone) for questions and work discussions. A high workload and the need to coordinate with staff in other countries meant many felt their work was never done.
The Work Design Initiative: The goal of the STAR program was to improve employee well-being and make work more manageable by changing three related aspects of work. First, professionals were given greater control over when and where they did their work. Second, managers and frontline professionals were trained to shift from valuing “face time” (long hours at the office) to a focus on “results” or concrete accomplishments only. Third, managers were encouraged to share their support for and interest in employees’ personal and family lives. All employees in the department were given blanket permission to work whenever and wherever they chose as long as they completed their work and met project deadlines. STAR involved eight hours of participatory training sessions for employees and managers to plan and troubleshoot together, so teams could maintain their productivity and coordinate well even with this increased flexibility and employee autonomy.
What Changed? STAR brought benefits to both employees and the company. Workers who took part in the STAR program were less burned out, less stressed, and felt less squeezed for time. With fewer interruptions, they often felt more productive (better able to concentrate and innovate). Enhanced schedule control enabled employees to adjust their work arrangements to better fit their personal lives, and helped parents spend more time with their children. These changes at work benefited physical health, with increased sleep and reduced risk of diabetes, heart disease, or stroke. Employees also experienced greater job satisfaction and were less likely to look for other jobs or to quit.
Context Matters: However, STAR is not a panacea. A version of this program was also implemented in a nursing home setting with low-income hourly shift workers, but the findings were more mixed.7 The researchers speculate this was due to having less latitude in scheduling within a highly structured setting. Together, these findings highlight the promise of schedule flexibility practices while recognizing the importance of tailoring interventions to occupational context.


Schedule Predictability

Many low-wage workers in today’s economy experience erratic work schedules that change from week to week or even day to day. Increasingly, employers in certain industries, like retail or food service, are using ‘just-in-time” scheduling technologies to routinely cut, extend, or otherwise alter employee schedules with little advance notice. As a result, practices such as on-call or “clopening” shifts (working a closing shift followed by an opening shift), last-minute cancellations, and variable or insufficient work hours are a common occurrence in these industries.8 Emerging research finds that workers exposed to this kind of regular scheduling uncertainty are more psychologically distressed and unhappy, have greater household economic insecurity, poorer sleep quality, higher work-family conflict, and poorer family functioning (which often manifests in children showing heightened anxiety and acting out). Moreover, schedule uncertainty also imposes costs on companies by increasing the risk of employee turnover.

In contrast, schedule predictability provides workers with ongoing schedule stability that makes it possible to coordinate life outside of work and maintain a stable income. To our knowledge, there is only one rigorous experimental study to date of an employer-based initiative to increase schedule predictability for hourly workers. The results of this research provide strong evidence that a shift towards stable schedules can improve both business and health outcomes. (See “Lessons from Gap Inc.” case study listed below).

CASE STUDY: Lessons from Gap Inc.: The Benefits of Stabilizing Workers' Schedules

Strength of Evidence: Strong 
Background: In the retail industry, employers have assumed that unstable or “just-in-time” schedules are inevitable. In an industry with razor-thin profit margins, corporate leaders have supposed that it is necessary to closely match staffing with changes in consumer demand in order to minimize labor costs. This study challenges the conventional wisdom that implementing stable schedules for hourly workers will necessarily hurt the bottom line.
The Work Design Initiative:

This study evaluated an intervention to enhance schedule stability in Gap Inc. stores in San Francisco and Chicago. Stores participating in the intervention increased schedule stability by:

  • improving the consistency of associate shifts (so employees had similar daily start and end times and weekly days and times);
  • boosting the adequacy of work hours for a core team of  part-time employees;
  • increasing associate input into scheduling through an app that enabled associates to swap shifts without manager involvement.
What Changed? Associates’ self-rated sleep quality improved by 6-8% on average as a result of the intervention, and those who were parents or held second jobs also reported decreased stress. Notably, giving employees more schedule stability also was good for business. The stores that implemented the additional stable scheduling practices experienced a 7% increase in their median sales and an increase in labor productivity of 5% (amounting to a $2.9 million increase in revenue). The increase in productivity was likely driven by improved retention of the more seasoned sales associates, who had been offered more adequate weekly hours. More stable schedules appear to be a promising practice for both retailers and their employees.
Context Matters: Contrary to widespread industry assumptions, fluctuating customer demand turned out not to be the primary source of instability in weekly payroll hours in this study. Instead, schedule instability was significantly influenced by last-minute decisions made at headquarters—about promotions, shipments, and leadership visits. For maximum effect, stable scheduling initiatives should address sources of instability that originate not just at the store level (which was the focus of this study) but also in corporate-level decision-making.

What is the extent to which a job allows an employee to make decisions?

4. Autonomy. Autonomy measures each employee's level of freedom and ability to schedule tasks. Employees like to be able to make decisions and have flexibility in their roles.

What is the expectation that successful performance of the task will lead to the desired outcome?

Expectancy is the belief that increased effort put into a task will result in the desired outcome. This may be influenced by the individual's confidence and the perceived difficulty of the desired goal.

What is the simple model of motivation?

The basic needs model, referred to as content theory of motivation, highlights the specific factors that motivate an individual. Although these factors are found within an individual, things outside the individual can affect him or her as well. In short, all people have needs that they want satisfied.

Is the process of building into a job such motivating factors as recognition and achievement?

Job enlargement consists of building into a job such motivating factors as responsibility, achievement, recognition, stimulating work, and advancement.