Biologists suspect that endosymbiosis gave rise to mitochondria before chloroplasts because:

journal article

A Briefly Argued Case That Mitochondria and Plastids are Descendants of Endosymbionts, but That the Nuclear Compartment Is Not

Proceedings: Biological Sciences

Vol. 266, No. 1426 (Jul. 7, 1999)

, pp. 1387-1395 (9 pages)

Published By: Royal Society

https://www.jstor.org/stable/51630

Abstract

Recent findings are summarized in support of the view that mitochondria (including hydrogenosomes) and plastids (including complex ones) descend from symbiotic associations of once free-living organisms. The reasoning behind endosymbiotic hypotheses stems from a comparison of biochemistry and physiology in organelles with that in free-living cells; their strength is shown to lie in the specific testable predictions they generate about expected similarity patterns among genes. Although disdained for many decades, endosymbiotic hypotheses have gradually become very popular. In the wake of that popularity, endosymbiotic hypotheses have been formulated to explain the origins of eukaryotic cell compartments and structures that have no biochemical similarity to free-living cells. In particular, it has become fashionable in recent years to entertain the century-old notion that the nucleus might also descend from an endosymbiotic bacterium. A critique of that hypothesis is formulated and a simple alternative to it is outlined, which derives the nuclear compartment in a mitochondrion-bearing cell.

Journal Information

A meeting of the Council on May 10th, 1832 resolved that abstracts of papers submitted for publication in the Philosophical Transactions from the year 1800 be published in Proceedings. By the 3rd volume the abstracts were arranged under the order in which the papers had been read at the meetings; the report of each discussion meeting was headed by a brief account of the business which preceded the reading of the papers. Included in the publication was the Anniversary meeting and reports. In 1905 the bulk of Proceedings increased so much that it split into two series: Series A (papers on the Mathematical, Physical and Engineering sciences) and Series B, (Biological sciences). Obituary Notices were printed in Proceedings up to April 1932 but since then have appeared as a separate publication. Proceedings are now published (A) once or twice (B) each month and include original papers of important new research findings and interesting reviews that shed new light on a particular subject or field.

Publisher Information

The Royal Society is a self-governing Fellowship of many of the world's most distinguished scientists drawn from all areas of science, engineering and medicine, and is the oldest scientific academy in continuous existence. The Society’s fundamental purpose, reflected in its founding Charters of the 1660s, is to recognise, promote, and support excellence in science and to encourage the development and use of science for the benefit of humanity. The Society has played a part in some of the most fundamental, significant, and life-changing discoveries in scientific history and Royal Society scientists continue to make outstanding contributions to science in many research areas.

Rights & Usage

This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
Proceedings: Biological Sciences © 1999 Royal Society
Request Permissions

Biologist Lynn Margulis first made the case for endosymbiosis in the 1960s, but for many years other biologists were skeptical. Although Jeon watched his amoebae become infected with the x-bacteria and then evolve to depend upon them, no one was around over a billion years ago to observe the events of endosymbiosis. Why should we think that a mitochondrion used to be a free-living organism in its own right? It turns out that many lines of evidence support this idea. Most important are the many striking similarities between prokaryotes (like bacteria) and mitochondria:

When you look at it this way, mitochondria really resemble tiny bacteria making their livings inside eukaryotic cells! Based on decades of accumulated evidence, the scientific community supports Margulis’s ideas: endosymbiosis is the best explanation for the evolution of the eukaryotic cell.

What’s more, the evidence for endosymbiosis applies not only to mitochondria, but to other cellular organelles as well. Chloroplasts are like tiny green factories within plant cells that help convert energy from sunlight into sugars, and they have many similarities to mitochondria. The evidence suggests that these chloroplast organelles were also once free-living bacteria.

The endosymbiotic event that generated mitochondria must have happened early in the history of eukaryotes, because all eukaryotes have them. Then, later, a similar event brought chloroplasts into some eukaryotic cells, creating the lineage that led to plants.

Biologists suspect that endosymbiosis gave rise to mitochondria before chloroplasts because:

Despite their many similarities, mitochondria (and chloroplasts) aren’t free-living bacteria anymore. The first eukaryotic cell evolved more than a billion years ago. Since then, these organelles have become completely dependent on their host cells. For example, many of the key proteins needed by the mitochondrion are imported from the rest of the cell. Sometime during their long-standing relationship, the genes that code for these proteins were transferred from the mitochondrion to its host’s genome. Scientists consider this mixing of genomes to be the irreversible step at which the two independent organisms become a single individual.

Grabbing take-out: Paramecium bursaria packs a lunch

Biologists suspect that endosymbiosis gave rise to mitochondria before chloroplasts because:
P. bursaria, photo © www.micrographia.com.

Paramecium bursaria, a single-celled eukaryote that swims around in pond water, may not have its own chloroplasts, but it does manage to “borrow” them in a rather unusual way. P. bursaria swallows photosynthetic green algae, but it stores them instead of digesting them. In fact, the normally clear paramecium can pack so many algae into its body that it even looks green! When P. bursaria swims into the light, the algae photosynthesize sugar, and both cells share lunch on the go. But P. bursaria doesn’t exploit its algae. Not only does the agile paramecium chauffeur its algae into well-lit areas, it also shares the food it finds with its algae if they are forced to live in the dark.

How did mitochondria originate according to the Endosymbiotic theory quizlet?

How did mitochondria originate, according to the endosymbiotic theory? Energy-producing bacteria were engulfed by larger bacteria and eventually evolved into mitochondria.

Which of the following statements supports the hypothesis of an endosymbiotic origin of mitochondria?

Which of the following statements supports the hypothesis of an endosymbiotic origin of mitochondria? Each mitochondrion has its own DNA molecule.

Can the products of photosynthesis be metabolized without mitochondrial enzymes?

(D) without mitochondrial CO2 production, photosynthesis could not occur. The statement “the products of photosynthesis could not be metabolized without mitochondrial enzymes” is false. The statement “all eukaryotes have mitochondria (or their remnants), whereas many eukaryotes do not have plastids” is true.

What is secondary endosymbiosis quizlet?

Terms in this set (9) Secondary endosymbiosis occurs when the product of primary endosymbiosis is itself engulfed and retained by another free living eukaryote. Secondary endosymbiosis has occurred several times and has given rise to extremely diverse groups of algae and other eukaryotes........