Personal authentication is the key of security and reliability in society. The reliability of personal identification using palm print is an equal and valuable evidence as the fingerprints which is commonly used modalities. The latent prints which are encountered at scene of crime (suicide notes) or in form of the questioned documents such as wills, property documents, official papers etc. The development of these latent palm prints not only gives the conclusive identification of the individual, but also provides the unique minutiae details for authentication. In this study, 40 samples (both male and female) from North part of India were taken to establish the identification of an individual through the development of latent palm prints present on documents. The obtained 12 parameters from this study not only increase the evidential value of such lateral palm prints, it can also be placed at par with the fingerprints in court of law on the top of all other scientific evidences.
You're Reading a Free Preview
Pages 7 to 15 are not shown in this preview.
You're Reading a Free Preview
Pages 19 to 23 are not shown in this preview.
You're Reading a Free Preview
Pages 33 to 38 are not shown in this preview.
You're Reading a Free Preview
Pages 42 to 45 are not shown in this preview.
You're Reading a Free Preview
Pages 52 to 57 are not shown in this preview.
You're
Reading a Free Preview
Pages 61 to 71 are not shown in this preview.
You're Reading a Free Preview
Pages 78 to 91 are not shown in this preview.
100% found this document useful (6 votes) 5K views 10 pages question documents reviewer © © All Rights ReservedOriginal Title
Copyright
Share this
document
Did you find this document useful?
100% found this document useful (6 votes)
5K views10 pages
Question Documents Reviewer
Original Title:
question documents reviewer
Jump to Page
You are on page 1of 10
You're Reading a Free Preview
Pages 5 to 9 are not shown in this preview.
Reward Your Curiosity
Everything you want to read.
Anytime. Anywhere. Any device.
No Commitment. Cancel anytime.
Two Kinds of Standard DocumentsA.Collected or Procured -Those which are obtained from files of document executed in the persons day today business, official, social or personal activities. Collected standards are known (genuine) handwritings ofan individual, such as signature and endorsements on cancelled checks, legal papers letters, commercial,official, public and private documents, and other handwriting such as letters, memoranda, etc. written in thecourse of daily life, both business and socials.B.Requested or Prepared -Those which are given or made upon the request of an investigator for purpose ofmaking comparative examination with the request writing. Request standards are signature or otherhandwritings (or hand printings) written by an individual upon request for the purpose of comparison withother handwriting, or for specimen purposes. In most instances, collected standards are preferable torequest standards, though both types should be submitted if available. Standards should be collected from aperiod dated within a year of the date questioned document, with some written within weeks or days of thequestioned writing.Disputed DocumentSuggests that there is an argument or controversy over the document and strictly speaking this is its truemeaning. In this text, as well as through prior usage, disputed document and questioned document are employedinterchangeably to signify a document under special scrutiny1. Basic Points that should be Considered in Obtaining Standardsa. Collected Standards1.Amount of Writing StandardsThere is no hard rule as to the fixed number of standards which may be considered sufficient or adequate,although experience shows that at least seven (7) standards usually constitute sufficient amount of standardsbut still, 10 is better than 7, 15 is better than 10, In short the more the better.
2.Similarity of the subject MatterAs a rule only like things are to be compared meaning standards should alwaysbecongruent to the nature ofthe questioned or disputed materials.3.Relative dates of the standards with the questioned matterStandards for comparison should relatively contemporary in dates. Those documents executed two yearsbefore or after the date of the questioned document are best. Contemporary as used in questioned documentrefers to documents that are executed within five (5) years prior to the questioned document.4.Kinds of writing instrument and paper usedWriting instrument and paper might influence the quality of writing. Therefore as much as possible utilize orlook for standards those are prepared using the same instrument and paper as the questioned.5.Writing ConditionsConditions both of the writer and the relative position under which questioned writing was executed should betaken into consideration although this is somewhat a difficult task for it is seldom or worst is so availablestandards written under similar condition as in questioned.